Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Peter W Reilly

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Peter W Reilly

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lowell (01600000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Peter W Reilly (01600040)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
40% - Partially meeting targets19

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement------
Achievement total0860.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth14-24-
Growth total4820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total1.07.2-5.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 14%-66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total0.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 12%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage12%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 16

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.4 496.6 -0.8 498.9 2120Declined
Lowest Performing 465.0 473.8 8.8 470.5 244Exceeded Target
High needs 490.7 489.0 -1.7 492.5 1510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.8 491.2 -0.6 493.1 1170Declined
EL and Former EL 485.1 484.0 -1.1 486.4 620Declined
Students w/ disabilities 473.9 472.4 -1.5 475.7 480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 490.2 487.7 -2.5 491.7 850Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.2 505.0 0.8 505.9 922Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.0 487.3 -6.7 495.5 2120Declined
Lowest Performing 465.5 466.0 0.5 468.5 242Improved Below Target
High needs 488.7 480.8 -7.9 490.3 1510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 489.1 481.7 -7.4 490.1 1170Declined
EL and Former EL 486.5 477.8 -8.7 488.0 620Declined
Students w/ disabilities 476.0 472.0 -4.0 477.8 480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 486.7 479.9 -6.8 488.3 850Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 500.7 494.0 -6.7 502.4 920Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.8 50.0 963Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.6 50.0 232Below Target
High needs 50.5 50.0 643Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.2 50.0 533Met Target
EL and Former EL 53.9 50.0 303Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 48.6 50.0 442Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.0 50.0 383Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.7 50.0 961Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.9 50.0 232Below Target
High needs 36.2 50.0 641Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.8 50.0 531Below Target
EL and Former EL 42.6 50.0 302Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 38.7 50.0 441Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 35.4 50.0 381Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.8 59.4 -0.4 70.2 1012Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 59.8 59.4 -0.4 70.2 1012Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.4 9.3 -1.9 6.1 4540Declined
Lowest Performing 7.4 8.3 -0.9 3.5 240Declined
High needs 9.2 12.4 -3.2 6.9 2980Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 12.0 -1.7 7.2 2170Declined
EL and Former EL 9.1 11.0 -1.9 6.4 1270Declined
Students w/ disabilities 9.5 15.0 -5.5 5.7 800Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 35--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 12.4 9.4 3.0 8.7 1712Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.2 8.1 -3.9 2.5 2110Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 226 22499Yes 1 226 22499Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 164 16299Yes 1 164 16299Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 128 12799Yes 1 128 12799Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 70 70100Yes 1 70 70100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 50 4896Yes 1 50 4896Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 17---- 17---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 93 9299Yes 1 93 9299Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 94 9399Yes 1 94 9399Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles