Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph McAvinnue

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Joseph McAvinnue

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lowell (01600000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Joseph McAvinnue (01600010)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
82% - Meeting targets14

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total8860.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-24-
Growth total3820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total5.87.2-6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 81%-83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total2822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 24

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 486.0 493.3 7.3 488.0 1784Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 463.9 470.7 6.8 469.2 214Exceeded Target
High needs 481.4 490.0 8.6 483.4 1404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 482.9 490.2 7.3 484.5 1144Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 474.2 484.1 9.9 475.8 704Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 470.5 482.7 12.2 472.3 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 25--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino 479.9 486.3 6.4 481.6 954Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.1 502.5 4.4 500.2 434Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 488.8 491.8 3.0 490.6 1784Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 465.9 471.9 6.0 469.2 214Exceeded Target
High needs 484.9 488.7 3.8 486.8 1404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 486.2 487.8 1.6 487.6 1143Met Target
EL and Former EL 480.5 484.9 4.4 482.3 704Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 469.8 485.3 15.5 471.9 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 25--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino 484.3 486.6 2.3 485.9 954Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.9 499.3 2.4 499.2 433Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.5 50.0 832Below Target
Lowest Performing 42.2 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 38.1 50.0 631Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.7 50.0 541Below Target
EL and Former EL 40.7 50.0 302Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 41.1 50.0 452Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 18--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.0 50.0 831Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.1 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 39.5 50.0 631Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.6 50.0 541Below Target
EL and Former EL 41.5 50.0 302Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 40.7 50.0 452Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 18--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.0 69.0 19.0 62.8 1134Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 50.0 69.0 19.0 62.8 1134Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.9 15.4 -5.5 8.0 3960Declined
Lowest Performing 4.8 9.5 -4.7 0.1 210Declined
High needs 11.4 17.4 -6.0 9.1 3270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 19.8 -8.7 8.7 2470Declined
EL and Former EL 11.7 11.4 0.3 8.0 1582Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 6.8 22.4 -15.6 2.5 490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 59--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 23--
Hispanic/Latino 10.5 19.9 -9.4 7.1 2110Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 14.9 13.2 1.7 12.3 912Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 201 200100Yes 1 201 201100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 161 16099Yes 1 161 161100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 130 12999Yes 1 130 130100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 85 8499Yes 1 85 85100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 106 10599Yes 1 106 106100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 48 48100Yes 1 48 48100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles