Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Glenbrook Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Glenbrook Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Longmeadow (01590000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Glenbrook Middle (01590017)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total101267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-44-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.00410.0
Weighted total8.510.3-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 83%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total9.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 96%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage96%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 87

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.2 511.8 1.6 511.9 3373Met Target
Lowest Performing 490.7 497.8 7.1 494.6 544Exceeded Target
High needs 495.5 498.5 3.0 497.1 914Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 502.3 503.1 0.8 503.9 303Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 491.4 494.0 2.6 492.7 704Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 515.8 518.6 2.8 517.7 364Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 510.4 512.1 1.7 512.0 2603Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.1 510.4 3.3 508.3 3374Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 486.5 492.7 6.2 489.3 544Exceeded Target
High needs 491.0 494.7 3.7 492.4 924Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.4 497.9 1.5 497.4 303Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 485.2 489.1 3.9 487.0 714Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 518.3 521.5 3.2 520.7 364Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.6 510.7 4.1 507.9 2604Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.8 84.5 2.7 84.0 1133Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 52.1 73.3 21.2 55.3 294Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.7 84.2 3.5 82.8 954Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.5 50.0 3173Met Target
Lowest Performing 65.5 50.0 544Exceeded Target
High needs 55.8 50.0 853Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.9 50.0 283Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 56.0 50.0 663Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 62.5 50.0 334Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.0 50.0 2463Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.5 50.0 3183Met Target
Lowest Performing 67.1 50.0 544Exceeded Target
High needs 53.8 50.0 873Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.4 50.0 293Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 53.7 50.0 683Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 61.8 50.0 334Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.8 50.0 2463Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.4 3.8 1.6 4.4 3444Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 5.5 7.4 -1.9 2.3 540Declined
High needs 8.6 4.6 4.0 6.6 874Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.2 7.7 11.5 15.0 264Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 4.3 1.8 3.4 702Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 384Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.0 3.8 1.2 3.9 2643Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 343 342100Yes 1 344 34299Yes 1 115 11499Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 95 9499Yes 1 96 9599Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 11----
EL and Former EL 10---- 10---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 73 7299Yes 1 74 7399Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 37 37100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 12---- 12---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 19---- 19---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 263 263100Yes 1 264 263100Yes 1 96 9599Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles