Massachusetts School and District Profiles

C A Farley

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - C A Farley

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Hudson (01410000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
C A Farley (01410030)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement------
Achievement total4860.04867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total6820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.03410.0
Weighted total4.07.2-3.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 56%-51%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 44

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.7 502.9 8.2 496.2 1764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 473.7 484.0 10.3 479.2 264Exceeded Target
High needs 482.7 493.9 11.2 484.5 774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.6 494.7 10.1 485.9 514Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 31--
Students w/ disabilities 472.9 488.6 15.7 474.7 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.3 504.3 8.0 498.0 1524Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.0 495.7 -2.3 499.5 1760Declined
Lowest Performing 475.4 473.9 -1.5 478.4 260Declined
High needs 486.1 485.3 -0.8 487.7 770Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.3 485.6 -1.7 488.3 510Declined
EL and Former EL---- 31--
Students w/ disabilities 473.7 478.9 5.2 475.5 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.3 497.0 -2.3 501.0 1520Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.9 50.0 1024Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 56.2 50.0 263Met Target
High needs 62.3 50.0 424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.3 50.0 324Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 11--
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 63.5 50.0 914Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.7 50.0 1022Below Target
Lowest Performing 39.2 50.0 261Below Target
High needs 41.0 50.0 422Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 39.1 50.0 321Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 11--
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.5 50.0 912Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.0 93.3 38.3 62.8 454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 45--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.1 9.0 -2.9 4.8 3790Declined
Lowest Performing 3.6 3.8 -0.2 0.0 263Met Target
High needs 9.6 16.3 -6.7 7.3 1780Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.5 16.4 -4.9 8.4 1100Declined
EL and Former EL---- 81--
Students w/ disabilities 9.8 22.7 -12.9 6.0 440Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 63--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.4 6.8 -1.4 3.7 2930Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 186 18599Yes 1 185 18499Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 86 8599Yes 1 85 8499Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 56 56100Yes 1 55 55100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 38 38100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 26 2596Yes 1 25 2496Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 155 15499Yes 1 154 15399Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles