Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2018 Official Accountability Report - Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Holyoke (01370000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High (01370605)
GRADES SERVED
10,11,12
REGION
Strategic Transformation
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI)

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of broad/comprehensive support
Underperforming school

Low graduation rate

Low subgroup performance: Economically disadvantaged -Hispanic/Latino -High needs
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
67% - Partially meeting targets1

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----
Mathematics achievement44----
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121240.0---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----
Mathematics growth14----
Growth total3820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate04----
High school completion total41220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total1410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44----
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total4810.0---
Weighted total6.710.0----
Percentage of possible points 67%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total7.510.7-
Percentage of possible points 70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 1

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.5 91.2 22.7 70.2 344Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 68.0 90.6 22.6 70.2 324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 67.9 90.5 22.6 69.7 294Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino 68.0 90.9 22.9 70.0 334Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.6 58.3 10.7 49.8 364Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 47.1 59.6 12.5 49.5 344Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.9 60.5 13.6 49.4 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino 48.2 58.6 10.4 51.4 354Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.8 61.7 6.9 57.3 304Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.9 59.8 4.9 57.2 284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.9 61.0 6.1 57.8 254Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino 53.1 62.1 9.0 57.1 294Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.9 50.0 302Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 42.1 50.0 282Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.2 50.0 252Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino 41.3 50.0 292Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 1--

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.8 50.0 321Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 38.5 50.0 301Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.6 50.0 272Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 15--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino 37.4 50.0 311Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 1--

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 40.0 59.1 19.1 43.8 884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 39.8 57.6 17.8 43.9 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.9 59.0 18.1 45.8 834Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 30--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 41.9 55.1 13.2 47.0 784Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 7--

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 55.6 47.0 -8.6 58.7 1150Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 55.8 46.9 -8.9 60.5 1130Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.4 46.3 -10.1 61.3 1100Declined
EL and Former EL---- 34--
Students w/ disabilities---- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino 53.6 46.7 -6.9 59.1 1050Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 10--

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 6.7 17.1 -10.4 6.0 2520Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 6.3 16.9 -10.6 5.7 2310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.8 16.2 -10.4 5.2 2100Declined
EL and Former EL---- 72--
Students w/ disabilities---- 98--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 6.9 17.5 -10.6 6.2 2290Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 17--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.1 13.5 -5.6 23.1 371No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 37--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.1 40.8 3.3 41.7 1914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 46.0 42.5 3.5 42.8 1793Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.4 44.0 2.4 43.1 1502Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 73--
Students w/ disabilities---- 66--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 44.5 41.8 2.7 40.6 1772Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 8--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 24.5 16.3 -8.2 30.6 1410Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 21.3 11.6 -9.7 27.6 1290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.0 12.6 -9.4 28.5 1190Declined
EL and Former EL---- 52--
Students w/ disabilities---- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 23.0 17.2 -5.8 30.5 1280Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 7--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 43 4195Yes 1 43 4298Yes 1 43 4195Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 41 3995Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1 41 3995Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 38 3695Yes 1 38 3797Yes 1 38 3695Yes 1
EL and Former EL 18---- 18---- 18----
Students w/ disabilities 15---- 15---- 15----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 42 4095Yes 1 42 4198Yes 1 42 4095Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 1---- 1---- 1----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles