Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Morgan Full Service Community School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Morgan Full Service Community School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Holyoke (01370000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Morgan Full Service Community School (01370025)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
REGION
Strategic Transformation
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-14-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total81260.05867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total6.19.6-4.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 64%-57%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total71267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total5.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 57%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 6

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 481.1 482.1 1.0 483.1 2192Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 462.4 462.4 0.0 467.7 331No Change
High needs 480.5 481.4 0.9 482.5 2102Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 480.7 481.5 0.8 482.3 2062Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 477.6 478.4 0.8 479.2 1222Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 469.1 471.3 2.2 470.9 563Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 480.8 482.1 1.3 482.5 1973Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 4--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 477.9 479.0 1.1 479.7 2192Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 459.2 466.0 6.8 462.5 334Exceeded Target
High needs 477.1 478.2 1.1 479.0 2102Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 477.5 478.4 0.9 478.9 2063Met Target
EL and Former EL 475.3 476.5 1.2 477.1 1222Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 466.1 469.9 3.8 468.2 564Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 477.6 478.4 0.8 479.2 1972Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 4--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.1 48.4 4.3 47.0 764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 42.5 46.8 4.3 45.6 713Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.8 47.1 4.3 45.3 704Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 36.8 43.5 6.7 40.1 464Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 43.9 47.3 3.4 47.0 653Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 3--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.8 50.0 1682Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.3 50.0 322Below Target
High needs 45.3 50.0 1602Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.0 50.0 1572Below Target
EL and Former EL 49.3 50.0 922Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 37.4 50.0 371Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 45.9 50.0 1492Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 4--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.4 50.0 1672Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.2 50.0 322Below Target
High needs 43.3 50.0 1592Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.3 50.0 1562Below Target
EL and Former EL 45.2 50.0 932Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 37.0 50.0 371Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 43.0 50.0 1502Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 2--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.0 41.4 -7.6 45.3 872Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 49.0 41.4 -7.6 45.3 872Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.1 17.1 2.0 17.2 3683Met Target
Lowest Performing 2.6 9.1 -6.5 0.0 330Declined
High needs 19.7 17.8 1.9 17.4 3543Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.2 17.2 2.0 16.8 3193Met Target
EL and Former EL 20.6 13.5 7.1 16.9 2004Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 14.5 22.4 -7.9 10.2 850Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino 18.6 17.3 1.3 15.2 3352Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 8--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 258 258100Yes 1 255 255100Yes 1 87 87100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 249 249100Yes 1 246 246100Yes 1 82 82100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 242 242100Yes 1 239 239100Yes 1 81 81100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 148 148100Yes 1 145 145100Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 68 68100Yes 1 68 68100Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 13---- 13---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 232 232100Yes 1 229 229100Yes 1 75 75100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 6---- 6---- 4----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles