Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Beeman Memorial

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Beeman Memorial

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Gloucester (01070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Beeman Memorial (01070010)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement24-34-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total51260.05867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5820.03822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total4.79.6-4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 49%-59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total71267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total6.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 55

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.6 501.0 1.4 501.1 1653Met Target
Lowest Performing 479.1 483.2 4.1 484.6 252Improved Below Target
High needs 496.0 497.1 1.1 497.8 1102Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.4 499.6 2.2 498.7 874Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 485.9 489.2 3.3 487.2 244Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 488.3 486.9 -1.4 490.1 370Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 487.8 489.3 1.5 489.3 263Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.0 502.5 1.5 502.7 1293Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 495.0 495.8 0.8 496.5 1652Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 472.8 476.1 3.3 475.8 253Met Target
High needs 489.7 492.3 2.6 491.3 1104Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.0 494.7 4.7 491.0 874Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 481.0 486.2 5.2 482.5 244Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 482.7 481.7 -1.0 484.5 370Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 479.4 486.2 6.8 481.0 264Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.8 497.1 0.3 498.5 1292Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.1 63.9 -5.2 71.8 610Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 59.7 57.7 -2.0 63.1 391No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.2 60.6 1.4 63.0 332Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 74.4 69.0 -5.4 77.2 500Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.6 50.0 1072Below Target
Lowest Performing 39.0 50.0 241Below Target
High needs 43.3 50.0 692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.0 50.0 552Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 31.7 50.0 201Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.6 50.0 862Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.7 50.0 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.9 50.0 242Below Target
High needs 54.8 50.0 693Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.2 50.0 553Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 48.2 50.0 202Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.3 50.0 863Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.0 78.1 3.1 62.8 323Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 75.0 78.1 3.1 62.8 323Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.2 9.1 2.1 9.9 2964Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 19.2 8.0 11.2 15.3 254Exceeded Target
High needs 13.8 12.4 1.4 11.5 1862Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.3 15.3 2.0 14.2 1312Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 12.5 9.1 3.4 9.8 444Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 14.8 13.6 1.2 11.0 592Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 13.6 13.3 0.3 9.9 452Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.0 7.3 3.7 9.3 2334Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 174 174100Yes 1 173 173100Yes 1 65 65100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 117 117100Yes 1 116 116100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 94 94100Yes 1 93 93100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 28 28100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 6----
Students w/ disabilities 40 40100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Asian 8---- 8---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 28 28100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 132 132100Yes 1 132 132100Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles