Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Georgetown High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Georgetown High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Georgetown (01050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Georgetown High School (01050505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
77% - Meeting targets86

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement34-14-
Achievement total101247.591267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-24-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total8822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-24-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total4810.02410.0
Weighted total8.810.7-7.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 82%-72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage77%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement---
Mathematics achievement---
Science achievement---
Achievement total---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism---
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total---
Weighted total---
Percentage of possible points --
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.0 99.8 0.8 100.0 1014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.2 99.0 2.8 97.6 244Exceeded Target
High needs---- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 5--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 99.7 0.8 100.0 924Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 97.0 2.2 96.3 1013Met Target
Lowest Performing 81.7 88.5 6.8 83.7 244Exceeded Target
High needs---- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 5--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.1 96.7 0.6 97.7 923Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 95.8 0.6 96.6 1013Met Target
Lowest Performing 83.7 82.3 -1.4 85.8 241No Change
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.6 95.7 0.1 97.0 922Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.1 50.0 944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 45.9 50.0 242Below Target
High needs-- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.0 50.0 874Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.8 50.0 934Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 56.4 50.0 243Met Target
High needs-- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.2 50.0 864Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 95.7 -1.4 98.3 933Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 95.6 -2.4 99.4 903Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.9 98.0 0.1 98.9 1023Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 28--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.8 99.0 1.2 98.9 983Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.7 -0.7 1.0 4113Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 84--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 42--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 56--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.0 0.8 -0.8 1.0 3833Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.5 16.3 -1.8 13.5 4060Declined
Lowest Performing 23.1 20.8 2.3 17.8 242Improved Below Target
High needs---- 78--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 52--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 14.3 16.4 -2.1 13.0 3780Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.8 54.8 6.0 52.0 2084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 50--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 50.0 54.9 4.9 53.0 1934Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 105 10499Yes 1 105 10499Yes 1 105 105100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 14---- 14---- 14----
Econ. Disadvantaged 6---- 6---- 6----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 12---- 12---- 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 3---- 3---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 96 9599Yes 1 96 9599Yes 1 96 96100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles