Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Penn Brook

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Penn Brook

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Georgetown (01050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Penn Brook (01050010)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total31267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total4822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.03410.0
Weighted total3.210.3-3.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 31%-49%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total31267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total3.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 30%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage30%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 21

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.0 506.3 0.3 507.5 3952Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 482.6 486.7 4.1 487.3 722Improved Below Target
High needs 489.6 490.9 1.3 491.2 963Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.4 501.9 2.5 500.8 434Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 479.9 482.3 2.4 481.6 614Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 506.2 506.1 -0.1 507.8 3751No Change

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.5 500.2 -1.3 502.9 3970Declined
Lowest Performing 478.4 479.3 0.9 482.0 732Improved Below Target
High needs 484.7 483.6 -1.1 486.4 960Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.6 490.7 -0.9 492.7 430Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 476.9 477.2 0.3 479.0 612Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 501.5 500.2 -1.3 503.0 3770Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.5 78.5 -1.0 81.9 941No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.3 53.3 -5.0 61.1 230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 79.7 78.4 -1.3 82.1 891No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.7 50.0 3012Below Target
Lowest Performing 46.6 50.0 722Below Target
High needs 50.2 50.0 703Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.0 50.0 333Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 50.7 50.0 443Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 47.2 50.0 2882Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.2 50.0 3022Below Target
Lowest Performing 39.6 50.0 731Below Target
High needs 39.2 50.0 701Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.7 50.0 331Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 38.1 50.0 441Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 42.8 50.0 2892Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.2 4.3 0.9 4.1 5993Met Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 4.1 -4.1 0.0 733Met Target
High needs 9.7 9.2 0.5 7.3 1312Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.5 14.0 0.5 11.0 572Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 6.2 4.9 1.3 2.9 812Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 5.3 3.9 1.4 4.0 5663Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 399 39799Yes 1 399 399100Yes 1 94 94100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 96 96100Yes 1 96 96100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 7----
EL and Former EL 5---- 5---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 61 61100Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1 16----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 6---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 1----
White 379 37799Yes 1 379 379100Yes 1 89 89100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles