Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Crocker Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Crocker Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Fitchburg (00970000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Crocker Elementary (00970016)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
51% - Partially meeting targets45

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-44-
Mathematics achievement14-24-
Science achievement------
Achievement total2860.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.01410.0
Weighted total2.27.2-5.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 31%-70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total3867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total2.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 38%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage38%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 66

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.9 504.4 -0.5 506.4 2001No Change
Lowest Performing 479.5 487.5 8.0 484.2 204Exceeded Target
High needs 502.8 501.1 -1.7 504.4 1500Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 503.3 501.6 -1.7 504.7 1390Declined
EL and Former EL 499.5 494.1 -5.4 501.5 420Declined
Students w/ disabilities 491.0 487.0 -4.0 492.7 490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 500.0 499.9 -0.1 501.1 981No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 510.0 507.8 -2.2 511.6 750Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.7 505.3 -0.4 507.1 2001No Change
Lowest Performing 484.9 485.1 0.2 488.5 202Improved Below Target
High needs 503.6 502.6 -1.0 505.3 1503Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 504.2 502.7 -1.5 505.3 1393Met Target
EL and Former EL 502.9 496.7 -6.2 505.1 420Declined
Students w/ disabilities 493.2 494.1 0.9 495.3 493Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 501.6 502.9 1.3 503.2 983Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 511.5 508.4 -3.1 513.0 753Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.7 50.0 912Below Target
Lowest Performing 56.2 50.0 203Met Target
High needs 40.7 50.0 692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.8 50.0 632Below Target
EL and Former EL 36.8 50.0 251Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 40.9 50.0 222Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 35.7 50.0 441Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.0 50.0 332Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.0 50.0 922Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.0 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 43.8 50.0 702Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.3 50.0 642Below Target
EL and Former EL 41.9 50.0 262Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 44.3 50.0 222Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 40.7 50.0 452Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.4 50.0 332Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.8 52.5 -10.3 62.8 612Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 62.8 52.5 -10.3 62.8 612Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 16.6 21.6 -5.0 15.5 4860Declined
Lowest Performing 25.0 25.0 0.0 21.4 201No Change
High needs 20.0 24.8 -4.8 17.6 3710Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.1 26.4 -5.3 17.6 3030Declined
EL and Former EL 32.3 27.5 4.8 27.9 1203Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 24.7 26.2 -1.5 21.4 1030Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 20--
Hispanic/Latino 21.5 25.5 -4.0 17.9 2590Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 33--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 8.2 13.2 -5.0 6.9 1590Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 212 212100Yes 1 212 212100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 162 162100Yes 1 162 162100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 151 151100Yes 1 151 151100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 50 50100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 53 53100Yes 1 53 53100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 6---- 6---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 109 109100Yes 1 109 109100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 15---- 15---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 75 75100Yes 1 75 75100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles