Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Fairhaven

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - East Fairhaven

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Fairhaven (00940000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
East Fairhaven (00940010)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total9.510.3-6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage88%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 68

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.1 502.9 4.8 499.6 2034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 477.9 483.7 5.8 483.4 293Met Target
High needs 491.9 496.3 4.4 493.7 1044Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.4 496.4 4.0 493.7 834Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 487.2 488.9 1.7 489.0 423Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.2 503.1 4.9 499.9 1704Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.1 497.0 2.9 495.6 2034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 468.8 482.3 13.5 471.8 294Exceeded Target
High needs 488.3 491.3 3.0 489.9 1044Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.7 492.2 3.5 489.7 834Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 484.2 486.9 2.7 486.0 424Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 494.0 497.3 3.3 495.7 1704Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.6 74.6 5.0 72.3 594Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 60.3 68.5 8.2 63.7 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 65.0 70.7 5.7 68.8 234Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 68.3 75.5 7.2 71.1 504Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.7 50.0 1253Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.8 50.0 293Met Target
High needs 47.3 50.0 642Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.9 50.0 482Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 50.8 50.0 243Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.9 50.0 1053Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.7 50.0 1263Met Target
Lowest Performing 71.8 50.0 294Exceeded Target
High needs 55.7 50.0 653Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.9 50.0 493Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 65.6 50.0 254Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.4 50.0 1063Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.9 4.9 -2.0 1.6 3460Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 6.9 -6.9 0.0 290Declined
High needs 4.9 8.2 -3.3 2.6 1700Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.3 9.3 -2.0 4.2 1180Declined
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 3.3 0.1 0.0 613Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.8 4.8 -2.0 1.1 2910Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 208 208100Yes 1 208 208100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 105 105100Yes 1 105 105100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 84 84100Yes 1 84 84100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 15----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 3---- 3---- 2----
Asian 4---- 4---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 174 174100Yes 1 174 174100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles