Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph A Campbell Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Joseph A Campbell Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dracut (00790000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Joseph A Campbell Elementary (00790020)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
70% - Partially meeting targets48

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total51267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.00410.0
Weighted total5.110.3-6.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 50%-89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total8.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 46

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.2 501.5 2.3 500.7 2654Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 475.6 484.4 8.8 480.3 384Exceeded Target
High needs 489.9 492.5 2.6 491.5 954Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.1 499.8 5.7 495.5 504Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 478.8 483.3 4.5 480.5 534Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 498.1 501.2 3.1 499.7 2304Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.1 496.6 -0.5 498.5 2641No Change
Lowest Performing 471.9 480.5 8.6 475.5 374Exceeded Target
High needs 486.6 488.2 1.6 488.3 953Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.3 494.0 2.7 492.4 504Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 477.9 480.7 2.8 480.0 534Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 496.4 496.3 -0.1 497.9 2291No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.7 74.1 -3.6 80.1 870Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 56.7 67.4 10.7 59.5 334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.9 73.0 -4.9 80.3 740Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.3 50.0 1703Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.3 50.0 383Met Target
High needs 45.0 50.0 562Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.1 50.0 312Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 39.7 50.0 321Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 52.4 50.0 1473Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.8 50.0 1694Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 57.2 50.0 373Met Target
High needs 56.8 50.0 563Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.1 50.0 313Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 54.3 50.0 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 61.8 50.0 1464Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.3 8.8 -0.5 7.2 4201No Change
Lowest Performing 12.2 21.1 -8.9 8.6 380Declined
High needs 17.1 14.8 2.3 14.7 1423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.8 18.3 2.5 17.3 712Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 20.0 13.5 6.5 16.7 744Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 6.8 8.4 -1.6 5.5 3580Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 272 272100Yes 1 272 271100Yes 1 90 90100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 98 98100Yes 1 98 98100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 53 53100Yes 1 53 53100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 55 55100Yes 1 55 55100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 15---- 15---- 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 234 234100Yes 1 234 233100Yes 1 75 75100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles