Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Douglas High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Douglas (00770000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Douglas High School (00770505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
55% - Partially meeting targets35

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement14-14-
Achievement total91247.561267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24----
Extended engagement rate24----
Annual dropout rate04----
High school completion total41220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-44-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total2810.04410.0
Weighted total6.410.7-5.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 60%-50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage55%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate14-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total11220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total1810.0
Weighted total5.010.7-
Percentage of possible points 47%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 23

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 97.5 -2.0 100.0 1004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.8 96.0 -1.8 99.9 251No Change
High needs 97.9 92.0 -5.9 100.0 280Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.5 98.1 -1.4 100.0 914Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.4 92.7 7.3 87.3 994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 47.8 78.0 30.2 52.0 254Exceeded Target
High needs 64.6 86.1 21.5 66.8 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 85.5 93.1 7.6 87.6 904Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.2 90.6 -1.6 94.0 961No Change
Lowest Performing 78.3 76.0 -2.3 82.4 251No Change
High needs 77.2 82.1 4.9 79.8 284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 91.9 91.1 -0.8 93.7 871No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.3 50.0 953Met Target
Lowest Performing 41.9 50.0 252Below Target
High needs 41.4 50.0 242Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 55.3 50.0 863Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.7 50.0 942Below Target
Lowest Performing 39.6 50.0 251Below Target
High needs 42.9 50.0 232Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 12--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 44.2 50.0 852Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.9 90.5 0.6 91.9 1052Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 79.2 76.9 -2.3 83.0 390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.3 90.8 0.5 92.7 982Improved Below Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.5 93.9 0.4 95.5 992Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.5 87.5 0.0 90.6 481No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.2 94.6 0.4 96.2 932Improved Below Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.2 2.3 -1.1 1.1 3930Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.8 5.8 -3.0 2.5 1030Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 50--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 69--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 1.0 2.4 -1.4 1.0 3710Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.5 13.0 0.5 11.6 3912Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 21.7 4.0 17.7 16.2 254Exceeded Target
High needs 25.4 25.4 0.0 22.8 1181No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 44--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 75--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 13.8 12.5 1.3 11.8 3682Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.6 48.2 -19.4 73.7 1930Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.1 10.0 -35.1 53.1 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 46--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 67.2 48.7 -18.5 73.6 1870Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 103 103100Yes 1 102 102100Yes 1 103 103100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 30 30100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 17---- 16---- 17----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 16---- 15---- 16----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 3---- 3---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 94 94100Yes 1 93 93100Yes 1 94 94100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles