Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Col Moses Parker School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Col Moses Parker School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Chelmsford (00560000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Col Moses Parker School (00560305)
GRADES SERVED
05,06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-24-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total31267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-24-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.02410.0
Weighted total3.710.3-4.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 36%-57%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total1410.0
Weighted total4.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 41%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage41%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 71

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.1 508.8 -1.3 511.8 6980Declined
Lowest Performing 486.3 488.5 2.2 490.2 1202Improved Below Target
High needs 495.7 495.8 0.1 497.3 2242Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.2 499.0 -0.2 500.8 821No Change
EL and Former EL 504.3 503.9 -0.4 505.7 591No Change
Students w/ disabilities 491.1 488.1 -3.0 492.4 1290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 516.3 516.2 -0.1 518.2 1124Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 501.5 499.9 -1.6 502.9 380Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.6 508.1 -1.5 511.2 5230Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.7 507.4 -3.3 511.9 6983Met Target
Lowest Performing 484.9 486.6 1.7 487.7 1202Improved Below Target
High needs 495.4 495.8 0.4 496.8 2242Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 498.4 496.2 -2.2 499.4 820Declined
EL and Former EL 505.2 504.3 -0.9 506.8 590Declined
Students w/ disabilities 490.1 488.3 -1.8 491.9 1290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 523.7 519.8 -3.9 526.1 1124Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 496.9 496.7 -0.2 498.8 381No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.0 506.0 -3.0 510.3 5230Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.9 79.9 -7.0 89.1 3490Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 72.1 64.7 -7.4 75.3 1070Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 76.7 62.8 -13.9 79.6 430Declined
EL and Former EL---- 28--
Students w/ disabilities 64.8 56.6 -8.2 67.7 610Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 89.9 79.8 -10.1 91.8 570Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.2 81.6 -5.6 89.3 2630Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.8 50.0 6743Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.7 50.0 1203Met Target
High needs 53.1 50.0 2093Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.1 50.0 803Met Target
EL and Former EL 61.2 50.0 544Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 48.9 50.0 1182Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 62.3 50.0 1074Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 53.2 50.0 373Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.8 50.0 5053Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.3 50.0 6723Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.3 50.0 1193Met Target
High needs 52.3 50.0 2083Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.0 50.0 793Met Target
EL and Former EL 60.5 50.0 544Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 48.2 50.0 1182Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 63.8 50.0 1074Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 56.3 50.0 373Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.8 50.0 5043Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.5 4.0 0.5 3.5 7253Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.8 4.2 0.6 1.6 1202Improved Below Target
High needs 9.8 10.0 -0.2 7.8 2211No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.9 18.5 -1.6 12.7 810Declined
EL and Former EL 6.8 6.0 0.8 2.7 672Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 6.2 8.3 -2.1 3.5 1320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 2.7 3.5 -0.8 0.5 1143Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino 16.2 13.6 2.6 12.2 442Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.8 3.5 0.3 2.7 5413Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 720 70998Yes 1 720 71099Yes 1 357 35198Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 239 23297Yes 1 239 23397Yes 1 114 10996Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 92 9199Yes 1 92 9098Yes 1 46 4598Yes 1
EL and Former EL 65 6397Yes 1 65 6498Yes 1 29 2897Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 136 13196Yes 1 136 13096Yes 1 67 6296Yes 2
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 113 11299Yes 1 113 113100Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 14---- 14---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 43 4298Yes 1 43 4298Yes 1 21 2095Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 538 52998Yes 1 538 52998Yes 1 269 26498Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles