Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Canton High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Canton High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Canton (00500000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Canton High (00500505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
79% - Meeting targets82

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement34-34-
Achievement total101247.5111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total4810.00410.0
Weighted total8.110.7-8.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 76%-81%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total51247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total4.910.7-
Percentage of possible points 46%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 70

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.6 99.2 -0.4 100.0 2324Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 97.7 -2.3 100.0 554Exceeded Target
High needs 97.8 97.0 -0.8 99.4 501No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 97.5 -2.5 100.0 304Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.1 100.0 0.9 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 28--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 99.2 -0.4 100.0 1614Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 96.3 1.5 96.3 2343Met Target
Lowest Performing 80.5 89.7 9.2 82.5 564Exceeded Target
High needs 84.8 87.3 2.5 87.0 513Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.7 83.1 -5.6 90.7 310Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 97.2 100.0 2.8 98.7 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 29--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.9 98.3 1.4 98.5 1634Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 96.9 -0.1 98.4 2263Met Target
Lowest Performing 88.2 90.6 2.4 90.3 563Met Target
High needs 91.5 89.4 -2.1 93.8 451No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.3 89.3 -3.0 94.2 280Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.0 97.8 -1.2 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 25--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.8 97.8 0.0 99.2 1604Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.6 50.0 2093Met Target
Lowest Performing 42.5 50.0 492Below Target
High needs 46.6 50.0 412Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.5 50.0 262Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 60.9 50.0 224Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 23--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.4 50.0 1483Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.4 50.0 2102Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.4 50.0 492Below Target
High needs 40.3 50.0 412Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 35.8 50.0 261Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 56.5 50.0 223Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 23--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.4 50.0 1502Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.3 96.7 -0.6 98.5 2123Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.2 87.2 -7.0 97.4 470Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.0 90.9 -3.1 98.0 330Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 28--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.6 97.4 -0.2 99.0 1553Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.4 97.8 0.4 98.4 2243Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.6 94.2 3.6 93.4 694Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.7 94.0 2.3 95.7 502Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 27--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 98.2 0.5 98.8 1673Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 9513Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.2 1.2 1.0 2.0 1694Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.1 0.9 2.2 2.8 1104Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 73--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 874Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 103--
Hispanic/Latino---- 40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 37--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.3 0.6 -0.3 1.0 6833Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.0 10.6 -0.6 9.0 9910Declined
Lowest Performing 9.1 17.9 -8.8 3.8 560Declined
High needs 22.1 26.7 -4.6 19.4 2320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.7 31.9 -6.2 21.9 1350Declined
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities---- 94--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 5.9 7.7 -1.8 3.8 1043Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 106--
Hispanic/Latino---- 44--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 40--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 9.3 9.6 -0.3 8.0 6961No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.8 83.1 6.3 80.0 4904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.0 46.5 -3.5 58.0 990Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.9 51.5 -1.4 61.4 680Declined
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 80.6 93.5 12.9 86.3 464Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 41--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 81.8 87.6 5.8 84.8 3644Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 239 23699Yes 1 239 238100Yes 1 239 239100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 54 5398Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 34 3397Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 25 2496Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 32 3197Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 10----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 164 16299Yes 1 164 164100Yes 1 164 164100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles