Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lt Peter M Hansen

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lt Peter M Hansen

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Canton (00500000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lt Peter M Hansen (00500012)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
85% - Meeting targets88

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total91267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.01410.0
Weighted total8.010.3-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 78%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage85%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total7.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 90

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 511.5 510.3 -1.2 513.2 2383Met Target
Lowest Performing 485.9 494.7 8.8 489.8 374Exceeded Target
High needs 496.8 501.0 4.2 498.4 724Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.0 500.6 5.6 496.6 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 492.9 495.6 2.7 494.2 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 520.5 514.3 -6.2 522.4 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 499.7 499.6 -0.1 500.9 281No Change
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 514.4 512.2 -2.2 516.0 1613Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.4 507.3 0.9 507.6 2393Met Target
Lowest Performing 483.8 490.2 6.4 486.6 374Exceeded Target
High needs 492.7 495.9 3.2 494.1 724Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 489.9 493.8 3.9 490.9 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 490.8 490.4 -0.4 492.6 291No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 522.9 517.4 -5.5 525.3 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 495.9 499.3 3.4 497.9 294Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 507.7 507.9 0.2 509.0 1613Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.6 87.2 0.6 88.8 763Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.5 87.3 -0.2 89.6 513Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.5 50.0 1553Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.5 50.0 363Met Target
High needs 56.7 50.0 453Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.7 50.0 303Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.0 50.0 1073Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.3 50.0 1564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 58.0 50.0 373Met Target
High needs 57.5 50.0 463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.0 50.0 303Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 64.6 50.0 1084Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.6 3.9 0.7 3.6 4103Met Target
Lowest Performing 10.3 10.8 -0.5 7.1 371No Change
High needs 8.3 8.1 0.2 6.3 1242Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.5 13.1 4.4 13.3 613Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 31--
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 4.8 -1.0 1.1 420Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 474Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 11.9 9.8 2.1 8.5 612Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 3.7 3.5 0.2 2.6 2573Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 247 24599Yes 1 247 246100Yes 1 77 77100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 78 78100Yes 1 78 78100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 16---- 16---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 11----
Afr. Amer./Black 31 3097Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 11----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 164 16399Yes 1 164 16399Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles