Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Morse

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Morse

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Cambridge (00490000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Morse (00490045)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
79% - Meeting targets68

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total71267.58890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34----
Mathematics growth44----
Growth total7822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.00410.0
Weighted total6.510.3-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 63%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total4.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 42%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 68

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.7 504.9 3.2 503.2 1074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 480.2 495.7 15.5 484.9 204Exceeded Target
High needs 495.0 495.5 0.5 496.6 652Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.1 494.9 -0.2 496.5 451No Change
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 489.7 490.1 0.4 491.4 402Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black 493.8 497.8 4.0 495.4 304Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 507.9 511.6 3.7 509.5 354Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.3 502.6 1.3 502.7 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 478.4 492.8 14.4 482.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 494.4 495.0 0.6 496.1 652Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.2 492.5 -2.7 496.3 450Declined
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 488.8 491.1 2.3 490.9 403Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black 492.5 494.9 2.4 494.0 304Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 508.5 509.3 0.8 510.0 353Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 83.1 77.3 -5.8 85.5 430Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.0 65.7 -11.3 79.8 270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.4 68.2 -9.2 80.3 220Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White---- 18--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.8 50.0 623Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 48.8 50.0 322Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.9 50.0 242Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 18--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 57.0 50.0 243Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.7 50.0 614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 62.7 50.0 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.2 50.0 243Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 18--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 64.3 50.0 234Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.5 13.0 0.5 12.4 2072Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 20.0 25.0 -5.0 16.4 200Declined
High needs 20.2 18.8 1.4 17.8 1172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 26.5 21.0 5.5 23.0 814Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 18.6 18.3 0.3 15.3 602Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 29--
Afr. Amer./Black 10.5 3.8 6.7 6.7 534Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 9.1 12.0 -2.9 7.8 750Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 114 11298Yes 1 115 11398Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 68 6799Yes 1 68 6799Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 48 4798Yes 1 48 4798Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 13---- 13---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 41 41100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 15---- 16---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 15----
Hispanic/Latino 15---- 15---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 14---- 14---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 36 3597Yes 1 36 3597Yes 1 18----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles