Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fox Hill

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Fox Hill

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Burlington (00480000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Fox Hill (00480007)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-24-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total91267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total7.410.3-5.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 72%-66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage69%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 60

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.7 505.6 6.9 500.2 1704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 480.8 486.7 5.9 485.5 274Exceeded Target
High needs 485.2 493.2 8.0 486.8 434Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 477.9 491.5 13.6 479.6 204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 505.0 509.5 4.5 507.1 404Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.6 504.7 7.1 499.2 1054Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.8 504.6 2.8 503.2 1714Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 482.3 483.2 0.9 485.9 272Improved Below Target
High needs 487.4 494.3 6.9 489.1 444Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 480.2 489.3 9.1 482.3 204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 516.2 511.8 -4.4 518.7 414Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.4 501.9 2.5 500.9 1054Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.7 80.2 -1.5 84.1 621No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 3--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.7 81.4 -0.3 84.1 351No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.7 50.0 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.4 50.0 272Below Target
High needs 41.8 50.0 252Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.9 50.0 722Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.0 50.0 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.7 50.0 272Below Target
High needs 53.6 50.0 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.2 50.0 723Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.5 6.0 -1.5 3.4 3310Declined
Lowest Performing 3.7 11.1 -7.4 0.1 270Declined
High needs 7.3 8.0 -0.7 4.9 880Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 31--
Students w/ disabilities 7.5 7.5 0.0 4.2 401No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 10.3 11.8 -1.5 7.1 760Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.5 5.0 -1.5 2.2 2010Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 176 17398Yes 1 177 17599Yes 1 64 6398Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 46 4598Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 14----
Econ. Disadvantaged 15---- 16---- 3----
EL and Former EL 18---- 18---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 6----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 41 4098Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1 14----
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 9---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 11---- 11---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 108 10698Yes 1 109 10798Yes 1 37 3697Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles