Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John D Runkle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - John D Runkle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Brookline (00460000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
John D Runkle (00460045)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total101267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.00410.0
Weighted total8.410.3-6.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 82%-89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total9.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 94%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage94%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 79

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.6 512.5 1.9 512.3 4053Met Target
Lowest Performing 490.1 494.9 4.8 494.0 774Exceeded Target
High needs 493.7 497.8 4.1 495.3 1324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.6 504.6 8.0 498.2 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 500.6 501.5 0.9 502.0 403Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 490.5 491.4 0.9 491.8 853Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 509.4 509.1 -0.3 511.3 541No Change
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 502.7 505.3 2.6 504.1 414Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 518.3 521.3 3.0 519.9 474Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 511.2 513.4 2.2 512.8 2514Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 512.0 512.5 0.5 513.2 4064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.6 489.6 4.0 488.4 774Exceeded Target
High needs 494.2 500.0 5.8 495.6 1324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.3 498.3 10.0 489.3 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 506.2 506.0 -0.2 507.8 401No Change
Students w/ disabilities 490.2 493.8 3.6 492.0 854Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 517.8 514.5 -3.3 520.2 544Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 495.0 496.9 1.9 496.9 413Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 520.0 520.5 0.5 521.5 474Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 512.2 513.7 1.5 513.5 2524Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.4 85.7 3.3 84.6 1353Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 57.1 63.6 6.5 60.3 334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 56.3 62.5 6.2 59.2 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 84.1 87.6 3.5 86.2 874Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.8 50.0 3104Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 54.6 50.0 743Met Target
High needs 54.7 50.0 863Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL 62.7 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 50.5 50.0 593Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 57.1 50.0 413Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 58.8 50.0 303Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 64.2 50.0 444Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.4 50.0 1914Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.2 50.0 3143Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.9 50.0 773Met Target
High needs 57.7 50.0 883Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL 51.6 50.0 203Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 58.6 50.0 613Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 59.6 50.0 413Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino 56.8 50.0 303Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 64.0 50.0 444Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.7 50.0 1953Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.7 8.2 -0.5 6.7 5581No Change
Lowest Performing 7.7 9.1 -1.4 4.5 770Declined
High needs 13.7 13.6 0.1 11.7 1842Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.5 12.5 -1.0 7.3 400Declined
EL and Former EL 11.8 14.3 -2.5 7.7 840Declined
Students w/ disabilities 15.1 14.8 0.3 12.4 1152Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 2.7 3.5 -0.8 0.5 853Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino 17.2 13.8 3.4 13.2 582Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6.9 8.3 -1.4 5.9 600Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 7.1 8.0 -0.9 6.0 3390Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 422 41899Yes 1 422 41999Yes 1 142 13998Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 145 14399Yes 1 145 14399Yes 1 37 3697Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 34 3397Yes 1 34 3397Yes 1 9----
EL and Former EL 51 51100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1 7----
Students w/ disabilities 88 8698Yes 1 88 8698Yes 1 27 2696Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 57 57100Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1 16----
Afr. Amer./Black 12---- 12---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 45 45100Yes 1 45 45100Yes 1 12----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 48 4798Yes 1 48 4798Yes 1 22 2195Yes 1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 260 25799Yes 1 260 25899Yes 1 90 8898Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles