Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary E Flaherty School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Mary E Flaherty School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Braintree (00400000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Mary E Flaherty School (00400020)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total111260.07867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total7820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.04410.0
Weighted total8.49.6-6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 88%-83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 79%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 90

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.3 513.3 3.0 512.0 2074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 489.9 500.5 10.6 493.8 324Exceeded Target
High needs 497.6 502.6 5.0 499.2 904Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.3 505.3 9.0 497.9 424Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 504.9 505.2 0.3 506.3 412Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 492.2 494.3 2.1 493.5 424Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 513.8 515.0 1.2 515.7 514Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.6 514.5 4.9 511.2 1374Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.6 505.6 1.0 505.8 2063Met Target
Lowest Performing 486.3 488.9 2.6 489.1 313Met Target
High needs 498.0 498.1 0.1 499.4 902Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 498.3 499.4 1.1 499.3 423Met Target
EL and Former EL 505.3 502.6 -2.7 506.9 410Declined
Students w/ disabilities 492.5 489.3 -3.2 494.3 420Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 513.4 512.1 -1.3 515.8 514Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.8 504.8 2.0 504.1 1364Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.6 95.5 2.9 94.8 734Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 83.0 90.2 7.2 86.2 284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.5 94.9 3.4 93.6 494Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.4 50.0 1404Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 59.7 50.0 323Met Target
High needs 60.3 50.0 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 64.6 50.0 264Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 64.6 50.0 254Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 52.0 50.0 233Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 70.9 50.0 314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.5 50.0 974Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.8 50.0 1393Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.5 50.0 312Below Target
High needs 48.6 50.0 522Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.8 50.0 262Below Target
EL and Former EL 51.6 50.0 253Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 40.6 50.0 232Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 63.3 50.0 314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.1 50.0 963Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.7 73.9 -11.8 78.2 232Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 85.7 73.9 -11.8 78.2 232Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.4 5.2 0.2 4.4 3622Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 14.7 9.4 5.3 11.5 324Exceeded Target
High needs 9.5 11.0 -1.5 7.5 1540Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 15.9 -4.8 6.9 630Declined
EL and Former EL 3.7 2.9 0.8 0.0 684Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 10.6 18.7 -8.1 7.9 750Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 6.2 0.0 6.2 4.0 874Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.2 5.5 -1.3 3.1 2370Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 214 213100Yes 1 214 21299Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 95 95100Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 44 44100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 13----
EL and Former EL 45 45100Yes 1 45 45100Yes 1 14----
Students w/ disabilities 44 44100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 52 52100Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 13---- 13---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 140 13999Yes 1 140 13899Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles