Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lyon High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lyon Upper 9-12

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lyon Upper 9-12 (00350655)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools

Low participation rate: Economically disadvantaged -High needs
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
25% - Partially meeting targets8

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14----
Mathematics achievement04----
Science achievement04----
Achievement total11247.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14----
Mathematics growth04----
Growth total1822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total81220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total4810.0---
Weighted total2.710.7----
Percentage of possible points 25%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total1870.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total2.78.8-
Percentage of possible points 31%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage31%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.5 95.0 -0.5 97.2 301No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.8 94.0 -0.8 97.0 251No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 8--

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.0 68.1 -12.9 83.2 290Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 78.0 64.6 -13.4 80.4 240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 8--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.4 57.6 -3.8 63.9 230Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 7--

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 30.3 50.0 241Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs-- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 7--

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 21.6 50.0 220Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs-- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 7--

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 88.2 81.3 -6.9 92.0 320Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 86.7 79.3 -7.4 90.8 290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 11--

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 84.8 94.1 9.3 87.9 344Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 86.7 93.3 6.6 91.4 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 3.8 0.0 3.8 3.4 1254Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 4.2 0.0 4.2 3.8 984Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 62--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 31--
Hispanic/Latino---- 43--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 37--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.6 57.3 -7.7 47.2 1310Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.5 56.0 -4.5 48.3 1090Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 65--
EL and Former EL---- 38--
Students w/ disabilities---- 47--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 29--
Hispanic/Latino---- 44--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 41--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.3 63.5 52.2 17.4 634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 13.3 53.8 40.5 19.6 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 19--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 19--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 35 3497Yes 1 35 3397Yes 2 35 3295Yes 2
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 28 2796Yes 1 28 2696Yes 2 28 2594No 2
Econ. Disadvantaged 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 21 1994No 2
EL and Former EL 8---- 8---- 8----
Students w/ disabilities 12---- 12---- 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 4---- 4---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 11----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 10---- 10---- 10----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles