Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John A Bishop

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - John A Bishop

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Arlington (00100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
John A Bishop (00100005)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-24-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total101267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.04410.0
Weighted total8.010.3-4.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 78%-53%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total0.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 12%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage12%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 73

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 516.1 514.3 -1.8 517.8 2034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 491.2 494.1 2.9 495.1 312Improved Below Target
High needs 505.7 500.4 -5.3 507.3 480Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 499.0 493.6 -5.4 500.3 230Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 520.4 518.3 -2.1 522.3 214Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 517.6 515.0 -2.6 519.2 1494Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 512.0 507.6 -4.4 513.2 2033Met Target
Lowest Performing 484.2 486.4 2.2 487.0 312Improved Below Target
High needs 500.0 495.8 -4.2 501.4 480Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 493.2 485.7 -7.5 495.0 230Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 519.2 516.3 -2.9 521.6 214Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 512.9 507.1 -5.8 514.2 1493Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.4 87.1 -5.3 94.6 623Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 94.8 91.7 -3.1 96.9 424Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.5 50.0 1263Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.0 50.0 312Below Target
High needs 41.2 50.0 332Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.3 50.0 943Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.6 50.0 1262Below Target
Lowest Performing 46.5 50.0 312Below Target
High needs 47.7 50.0 332Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.6 50.0 942Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.2 4.4 -0.2 3.2 3611No Change
Lowest Performing 16.1 9.7 6.4 12.9 314Exceeded Target
High needs 7.1 9.6 -2.5 5.1 830Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities 11.6 9.3 2.3 8.9 433Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 5.9 0.0 5.9 3.7 564Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 1.9 3.9 -2.0 0.8 2593Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 206 206100Yes 1 206 206100Yes 1 62 62100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 51 51100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1 19----
Econ. Disadvantaged 19---- 19---- 9----
EL and Former EL 19---- 19---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 7----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 150 150100Yes 1 150 150100Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles