Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Andover West Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Andover West Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Andover (00090000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Andover West Middle (00090310)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-24-
Mathematics achievement44-24-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total8.810.3-3.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 85%-47%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total8.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 63

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.0 508.3 2.3 507.5 5094Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.5 486.6 1.1 490.2 822Improved Below Target
High needs 492.7 493.2 0.5 494.3 1302Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.2 496.5 1.3 496.6 533Met Target
EL and Former EL 494.7 494.7 0.0 496.7 261No Change
Students w/ disabilities 489.1 486.8 -2.3 490.8 840Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 512.2 516.4 4.2 514.3 794Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.2 506.8 1.6 506.8 3783Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.4 510.1 2.7 508.8 5104Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 486.1 486.2 0.1 489.7 822Improved Below Target
High needs 491.0 494.0 3.0 492.7 1304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.7 496.5 1.8 495.8 534Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 497.7 500.4 2.7 499.9 263Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 487.2 487.8 0.6 489.3 842Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 521.1 525.3 4.2 523.6 794Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.1 507.5 2.4 506.6 3784Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.2 84.1 1.9 84.6 1643Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 62.9 67.5 4.6 65.7 404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 59.4 67.2 7.8 62.5 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 93.8 92.0 -1.8 96.6 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.7 82.8 1.1 84.1 1192Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.1 50.0 4903Met Target
Lowest Performing 48.1 50.0 822Below Target
High needs 49.5 50.0 1172Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.1 50.0 493Met Target
EL and Former EL 49.8 50.0 242Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 47.9 50.0 752Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian 56.6 50.0 763Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.1 50.0 3653Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.4 50.0 4913Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.0 50.0 812Below Target
High needs 53.0 50.0 1173Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.0 50.0 493Met Target
EL and Former EL 61.4 50.0 244Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 49.3 50.0 752Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian 69.9 50.0 764Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.7 50.0 3653Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.2 5.9 -0.7 4.1 5280Declined
Lowest Performing 7.2 11.0 -3.8 3.6 820Declined
High needs 14.1 11.5 2.6 11.7 1303Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.0 10.0 5.0 11.5 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 8.3 10.0 -1.7 3.9 300Declined
Students w/ disabilities 13.6 11.8 1.8 10.3 852Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 844Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.8 6.7 -0.9 4.5 3860Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 524 51799Yes 1 524 51899Yes 1 172 16898Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 137 13699Yes 1 137 13699Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 56 56100Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1 16----
EL and Former EL 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 6----
Students w/ disabilities 88 8799Yes 1 88 8799Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Asian 82 82100Yes 1 82 82100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 13---- 13---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 30 2997Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 14----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 13---- 13---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 384 37898Yes 1 384 37898Yes 1 124 12097Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles