Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Charles C Cashman Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Charles C Cashman Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Amesbury (00070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Charles C Cashman Elementary (00070010)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
54% - Partially meeting targets42

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24----
Mathematics achievement24----
Science achievement------
Achievement total4867.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34----
Mathematics growth34----
Growth total6822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.0---
Weighted total4.17.6----
Percentage of possible points 54%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement---
Achievement total5867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 30

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.0 501.6 0.6 502.5 1712Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 491.1 492.6 1.5 492.9 793Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.4 494.6 0.2 495.7 532Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 481.8 489.5 7.7 483.6 444Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.5 502.7 0.2 504.2 1472Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.0 492.3 0.3 493.5 1682Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing---- 18--
High needs 481.2 482.2 1.0 482.8 782Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 482.8 484.4 1.6 483.8 534Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 473.3 475.7 2.4 475.1 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 494.0 494.0 0.0 495.7 1441No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.8 50.0 843Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 49.2 50.0 402Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.8 50.0 263Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 55.6 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.0 50.0 703Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.7 50.0 813Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 54.4 50.0 393Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.0 50.0 263Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.7 50.0 673Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.4 11.0 -4.6 5.1 3560Declined
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 12.6 18.6 -6.0 10.3 1720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.6 24.0 -6.4 14.5 1000Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 9.0 14.8 -5.8 5.2 810Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 32--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.2 10.0 -5.8 2.5 2990Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 177 17599Yes 1 177 17297Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 85 8398Yes 1 85 8296Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 56 56100Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 10---- 10---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 46 4496Yes 1 46 4394No 2 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 4---- 4---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 150 14899Yes 1 150 14597Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles