Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Benjamin J Phelps

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Benjamin J Phelps

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Agawam (00050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Benjamin J Phelps (00050020)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----
Mathematics achievement44----
Science achievement------
Achievement total8860.0---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----
Mathematics growth44----
Growth total6820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.0---
Weighted total6.47.2----
Percentage of possible points 89%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total7.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 91

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.1 501.7 9.6 494.1 1554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 22--
High needs 482.6 498.1 15.5 484.6 674Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.8 501.8 16.0 487.4 474Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 483.5 502.9 19.4 485.1 234Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 475.1 488.1 13.0 476.9 244Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 492.8 502.3 9.5 494.9 1334Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.1 505.0 8.9 497.9 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 488.0 501.8 13.8 489.9 654Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.3 502.4 14.1 489.7 464Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 492.7 508.0 15.3 494.5 234Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 476.6 492.6 16.0 478.7 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.5 505.0 8.5 498.8 1314Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.7 50.0 792Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 22--
High needs 51.0 50.0 283Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.1 50.0 682Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.9 50.0 794Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 66.3 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 70.7 50.0 204Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.5 50.0 684Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.0 90.9 10.9 78.2 334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 80.0 90.9 10.9 78.2 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.3 7.4 -2.1 3.4 3240Declined
Lowest Performing---- 22--
High needs 8.1 12.3 -4.2 5.8 1460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.5 13.8 -3.3 8.1 940Declined
EL and Former EL 2.2 4.7 -2.5 0.0 430Declined
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 12.5 -6.2 2.0 480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.9 5.9 -1.0 2.3 2860Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 161 15999Yes 1 160 15698Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 73 7197Yes 1 73 6995Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 52 5096Yes 1 52 4996Yes 2 0----
EL and Former EL 26 26100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 25 2496Yes 1 25 2394No 2 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 136 13499Yes 1 135 13298Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles