Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Albert F Ford Middle School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Albert F Ford Middle School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Acushnet (00030000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Albert F Ford Middle School (00030305)
GRADES SERVED
05,06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
65% - Partially meeting targets47

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total81267.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total6.810.3-4.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 66%-64%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage65%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total91267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total7.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 35

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 493.6 496.7 3.1 495.1 4024Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 474.9 474.6 -0.3 480.4 721No Change
High needs 484.3 486.3 2.0 486.1 1403Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.3 490.5 3.2 488.6 1054Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 476.1 472.8 -3.3 477.9 590Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 493.6 496.9 3.3 495.3 3874Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.4 499.9 1.5 499.9 4003Met Target
Lowest Performing 475.0 479.3 4.3 478.0 714Exceeded Target
High needs 487.3 489.5 2.2 488.9 1374Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.8 492.9 2.1 491.8 1024Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 478.7 478.9 0.2 480.5 582Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.4 500.4 2.0 500.1 3853Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.7 76.4 -0.3 79.4 1731No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 65.7 67.3 1.6 69.1 652Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 72.9 71.4 -1.5 76.7 481No Change
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 56.0 56.5 0.5 59.0 312Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 76.8 77.1 0.3 79.6 1662Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.5 50.0 3892Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.6 50.0 712Below Target
High needs 39.9 50.0 1311Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.8 50.0 992Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 34.7 50.0 531Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.2 50.0 3762Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.4 50.0 3873Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.5 50.0 713Met Target
High needs 50.0 50.0 1273Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.6 50.0 953Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 45.0 50.0 512Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.5 50.0 3753Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.1 4.7 1.4 4.8 4223Met Target
Lowest Performing 10.8 2.8 8.0 6.9 724Exceeded Target
High needs 12.6 9.7 2.9 10.3 1544Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.0 12.4 6.6 15.9 974Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 6.3 1.4 3.9 632Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.1 4.4 1.7 4.4 4053Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 415 413100Yes 1 415 41299Yes 1 178 17799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 149 14899Yes 1 149 14698Yes 1 68 6799Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 113 11299Yes 1 113 11097Yes 1 51 5098Yes 1
EL and Former EL 5---- 5---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 64 6398Yes 1 64 6297Yes 1 32 3197Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 8---- 8---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 399 39799Yes 1 399 39699Yes 1 171 17099Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles