Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Upper Cape Cod Vocational Technical

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Upper Cape Cod Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Upper Cape Cod Regional Vocational Technical (08790000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Upper Cape Cod Vocational Technical (08790605)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
78% - Meeting targets72

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement34-34-
Achievement total101247.5101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-14-
Growth total6822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total7810.00410.0
Weighted total9.010.7-7.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 84%-72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total111220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total6810.0
Weighted total9.210.7-
Percentage of possible points 86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 86

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 99.1 1.0 99.5 1764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.3 96.5 4.2 94.1 434Exceeded Target
High needs 95.9 98.3 2.4 97.9 744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.5 99.0 -0.5 100.0 514Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 91.9 96.2 4.3 94.4 334Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 99.2 1.1 99.4 1494Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.4 93.0 0.6 94.1 1753Met Target
Lowest Performing 70.7 72.7 2.0 73.5 433Met Target
High needs 85.1 86.5 1.4 87.2 723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.3 88.8 -2.5 94.4 491No Change
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 75.7 75.0 -0.7 78.7 321No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.2 93.3 0.1 94.8 1502Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.0 89.6 1.6 89.7 1733Met Target
Lowest Performing 68.5 72.2 3.7 72.8 443Met Target
High needs 80.3 84.4 4.1 83.1 724Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.3 85.9 0.6 88.2 482Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 71.8 76.5 4.7 74.8 344Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.9 91.2 2.3 90.7 1483Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.9 50.0 1643Met Target
Lowest Performing 42.8 50.0 392Below Target
High needs 48.6 50.0 692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.0 50.0 472Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 52.7 50.0 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.5 50.0 1393Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.6 50.0 1653Met Target
Lowest Performing 38.6 50.0 391Below Target
High needs 53.6 50.0 673Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.9 50.0 453Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 47.3 50.0 312Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.6 50.0 1433Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 97.6 -1.8 100.0 1673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 98.9 96.3 -2.6 100.0 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.7 96.9 -1.8 100.0 653Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 92.6 -7.4 100.0 270Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 97.4 -1.9 100.0 1553Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.0 100.0 2.0 99.7 1644Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.1 100.0 3.9 100.0 944Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.3 100.0 4.7 99.6 754Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 314Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.9 100.0 2.1 99.7 1484Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.1 0.2 1.0 7094Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.7 0.4 0.3 1.0 2724Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.2 0.5 0.7 1.1 1834Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.7 0.8 -0.1 1.0 1243Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 31--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 31--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 6213Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 12.3 11.7 0.6 11.2 7183Met Target
Lowest Performing 14.3 24.4 -10.1 7.7 450Declined
High needs 16.7 15.8 0.9 14.3 2922Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.3 18.6 2.7 16.7 1612Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 11.4 12.1 -0.7 8.3 1240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 37--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.1 11.5 -0.4 9.9 6151No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.3 64.9 9.6 61.0 3394Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 39.5 49.2 9.7 48.0 1324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 39.5 53.3 13.8 49.9 904Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 31.9 40.0 8.1 39.2 553Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 55.9 66.3 10.4 61.2 2974Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 178 17699Yes 1 177 17599Yes 1 178 17799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 75 7499Yes 1 74 7297Yes 1 75 75100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 51 51100Yes 1 50 4998Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 34 3397Yes 1 34 3296Yes 2 34 34100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 4---- 4---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 8----
Hispanic/Latino 4---- 4---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 10---- 11----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 150 14999Yes 1 150 150100Yes 1 150 14999Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles