Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bridge Street

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Bridge Street

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Northampton (02100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Bridge Street (02100005)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low participation rate: White -Students w/disabilities -Economically disadvantaged -All students
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
72% - Partially meeting targets23

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----
Mathematics achievement14----
Science achievement44----
Achievement total91267.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----
Mathematics growth24----
Growth total4822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.0---
Weighted total7.410.3----
Percentage of possible points 72%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total3.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 51%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 11

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.3 497.7 5.4 494.3 1004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 18--
High needs 486.4 489.6 3.2 488.4 554Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 483.9 490.3 6.4 485.5 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 482.9 486.8 3.9 484.7 274Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 494.3 501.5 7.2 496.4 664Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.5 489.0 -0.5 491.3 1021No Change
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 481.3 479.7 -1.6 483.2 570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 479.0 480.2 1.2 480.4 423Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 477.2 470.5 -6.7 479.3 290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 492.0 491.0 -1.0 494.3 670Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.3 72.0 17.7 57.2 334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 56.5 76.2 19.7 59.7 214Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.2 50.0 572Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 42.6 50.0 372Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.1 50.0 262Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 0--
Hispanic/Latino-- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.8 50.0 343Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.5 50.0 592Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 20--
High needs 42.5 50.0 392Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.4 50.0 282Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 33.6 50.0 201Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.2 50.0 352Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.6 10.3 4.3 12.7 1944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 14.9 12.2 2.7 12.6 1153Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.8 15.6 2.2 15.4 773Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 24--
Students w/ disabilities 18.0 13.0 5.0 13.7 544Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 13.2 8.3 4.9 10.6 1204Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 112 10594No 1 112 10796Yes 1 40 3694No 2
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 65 6095Yes 2 65 6295Yes 1 24 2296Yes 2
Econ. Disadvantaged 49 4594No 2 49 4796Yes 1 17----
EL and Former EL 13---- 13---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 32 2893No 2 32 3097Yes 2 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 6---- 6---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 17---- 17---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 75 6993No 2 75 7094No 2 26 2291No 2


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles