Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bowen

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Bowen

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Newton (02070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Bowen (02070015)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets90

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-34-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total111260.07867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total8.49.6-6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 88%-80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total8.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 85%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage85%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 91

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.6 508.3 1.7 508.1 2173Met Target
Lowest Performing 484.3 489.0 4.7 489.0 393Met Target
High needs 496.1 497.6 1.5 497.7 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.2 496.5 -0.7 498.6 230Declined
EL and Former EL 496.6 498.5 1.9 498.6 413Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 491.5 489.6 -1.9 493.2 390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 509.0 510.4 1.4 511.1 553Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.1 508.6 0.5 509.7 1312Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.4 510.6 4.2 507.8 2174Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 482.8 489.1 6.3 486.4 394Exceeded Target
High needs 495.0 500.5 5.5 496.7 814Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.4 492.1 -3.3 496.5 230Declined
EL and Former EL 498.8 507.3 8.5 501.0 414Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 487.8 492.4 4.6 489.9 394Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 515.8 517.7 1.9 518.3 554Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.3 510.1 3.8 507.8 1314Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.4 91.8 15.4 78.8 704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 55.0 76.3 21.3 57.8 204Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 70.7 94.9 24.2 73.1 394Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.3 50.0 1563Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.0 50.0 392Below Target
High needs 49.8 50.0 532Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL 54.3 50.0 283Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 39.4 50.0 231Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 60.2 50.0 394Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.5 50.0 943Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.5 50.0 1564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 60.9 50.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 58.8 50.0 533Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL 63.8 50.0 284Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 57.3 50.0 233Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 66.2 50.0 394Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.9 50.0 944Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.3 96.3 11.0 78.2 274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 85.3 96.3 11.0 78.2 274Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.7 6.6 -0.9 4.6 3620Declined
Lowest Performing 2.6 7.7 -5.1 0.0 390Declined
High needs 10.2 8.8 1.4 7.8 1362Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.8 22.7 -8.9 10.3 220Declined
EL and Former EL 10.7 4.4 6.3 6.3 904Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 8.0 -0.9 3.8 500Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 2.7 4.1 -1.4 0.0 983Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 27--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.6 6.8 -1.2 4.3 2050Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 225 225100Yes 1 225 225100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 89 89100Yes 1 89 89100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 7----
EL and Former EL 49 49100Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1 15----
Students w/ disabilities 40 40100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 58 58100Yes 1 58 58100Yes 1 19----
Afr. Amer./Black 16---- 16---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 7---- 7---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 135 135100Yes 1 135 135100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles