Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Argosy Collegiate Charter School

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Argosy Collegiate Charter School

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77, Target = 73.7 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 77, Target = 73.7CPI = 77, Target = 73.775 or Higher All Students 71.3 71.3 77.0 5.7 73.7 85.7 10204100Above Target
High needsCPI = 71, Target = 65.6 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 71, Target = 65.6CPI = 71, Target = 65.675 or Higher High needs 62.5 62.5 71.0 8.5 65.6 81.3 13119100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.2, Target = 68.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 74.2, Target = 68.1CPI = 74.2, Target = 68.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 65.2 65.2 74.2 9.0 68.1 82.6 1397100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------27--
Students w/ disabilities -------47--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------19--
Hispanic/Latino  61.9---- 81.0-32--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 77.1, Target = 76.7 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 77.1, Target = 76.775 or Higher White 74.6 74.6 77.1 2.5 76.7 87.3 314075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 71.1, Target = 81.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 71.1, Target = 81.9 75 or Higher All Students 80.3 80.3 71.1 -9.2 81.9 90.2 242040Declined
High needsCPI = 63.2, Target = 75.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 63.2, Target = 75.4 75 or Higher High needs 73.2 73.2 63.2 -10.0 75.4 86.6 501190Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.2, Target = 76.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 64.2, Target = 76.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 74.5 74.5 64.2 -10.3 76.6 87.3 35970Declined
EL and Former EL -------27--
Students w/ disabilities -------47--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------19--
Hispanic/Latino  70.2---- 85.1-32--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 72.9, Target = 84.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 72.9, Target = 84.2 75 or Higher White 82.8 82.8 72.9 -9.9 84.2 91.4 151400Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.0 3.920425 19.0 14.220425
High needs 0.0 1.711925 26.8 19.311925
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.19725 21.7 16.59725
EL and Former EL--27---27-
Students w/ disabilities--47---47-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--19---19-
Hispanic/Latino--32---32-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 1.6 4.314025 14.8 13.61400
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.0 12.720425 10.0 21.12040
High needs 1.8 6.711925 14.3 27.71190
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.2 7.29725 13.0 23.7970
EL and Former EL--27---27-
Students w/ disabilities--47---47-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--19---19-
Hispanic/Latino--32---32-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 13.1 14.31400 6.6 19.31400
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 26.0 46.0 20.0 51.0Yes185100Above Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 25.0 43.0 18.0 51.0Yes105100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 44, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 26.0 44.0 18.0 51.0Yes85100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-21--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-44--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 28.0 40.0 12.0 51.0Yes13075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 68.0 54.0 -14.0 51.0No18475On Target
High needsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 66.0 46.5 -19.5 51.0No10450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 64.0 47.0 -17.0 51.0No8450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-20--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher White 67.0 55.0 -12.0 51.0No12975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012.00-
High needs- 60.012.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.012.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students204203100Yes204204100Yes----
High needs11911899Yes119119100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged979699Yes9797100Yes----
EL and Former EL272696Yes2727100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities4747100Yes4747100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black19---19-------
Hispanic/Latino323197Yes3232100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White140140100Yes140140100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles