Massachusetts School and District Profiles

South Shore Vocational Technical High

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - So Shore Vocational Technical High

Organization Information

District:

South Shore Regional Vocational Technical (08730000)

School type:

High School

School:

So Shore Vocational Technical High (08730605)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.6	97.4	98.5	1.1	97.4	97.8	58	162	100	Above Target
High needs		93.0	94.4	97.2	2.8	95.9	96.5	73	90	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		98.4	98.4	99.0	0.6	98.5	99.2	88	51	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		90.3	92.2	95.5	3.3	94.3	95.2	67	55	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.4	97.3	98.4	1.1	97.3	97.7	41	157	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.0	92.5	90.3	-2.2	94.8	95.5	38	162	25	No Change
High needs		85.8	87.3	86.7	-0.6	91.7	92.9	69	90	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		94.5	94.5	88.2	-6.3	95.0	97.3	67	51	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		80.0	81.1	81.8	0.7	88.3	90.0	72	55	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.7	92.9	90.1	-2.8	95.2	95.9	23	157	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.3	88.7	83.8	-4.9	93.2	94.2	21	148	0	Declined
High needs		85.4	83.1	79.1	-4.0	91.5	92.7	30	80	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		91.1	91.1	80.4	-10.7	91.8	95.6	33	46	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		81.3	77.3	74.0	-3.3	89.1	90.7	44	50	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.7	89.2	83.9	-5.3	92.8	93.9	7	143	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.2	14.8	162	0	0.7	0.6	162	25
High needs	14.9	5.6	90	0	1.5	1.1	90	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	21.9	7.8	51	0	0.0	0.0	51	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	11.1	1.8	55	0	2.2	1.8	55	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	25.7	14.6	157	0	0.7	0.6	157	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	35.7	36.4	162	0	4.9	1.2	162	25
High needs	20.9	27.8	90	25	10.4	2.2	90	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	28.1	37.3	51	25	6.3	2.0	51	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	15.6	12.7	55	0	15.6	3.6	55	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	35.7	36.9	157	0	4.3	1.3	157	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.1	8.1	148	0	2.9	2.0	148	25
High needs	7.7	1.3	80	0	6.2	3.8	80	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.9	2.2	46	0	3.2	4.3	46	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.5	0.0	50	0	9.1	6.0	50	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	13.4	7.7	143	0	2.2	2.1	143	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.5	41.5	-2.0	51.0	Yes	150	75	On Target
High needs		41.0	44.5	3.5	51.0	Yes	80	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	32.0	-9.0	51.0	Yes	43	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	59.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	49	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.0	41.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	145	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.5	61.0	-0.5	51.0	No	149	100	Above Target
High needs		65.5	68.0	2.5	51.0	No	78	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.0	60.0	-2.0	51.0	No	43	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		73.0	72.0	-1.0	51.0	No	47	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		62.0	61.0	-1.0	51.0	No	144	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.6	93.3	-0.3	80.0	90.0	135	75	On Target
High needs		88.8	88.7	-0.1	80.0	90.0	71	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		88.4	90.0	1.6	80.0	90.0	40	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		94.0	93.7	-0.3	80.0	90.0	127	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.0	97.2	2.2	85.0	95.0	141	100	Above Target
High needs		94.2	95.0	0.8	85.0	95.0	80	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		92.3	93.0	0.7	85.0	95.0	43	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
White		95.2	97.0	1.8	85.0	95.0	133	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.3	0.8	1.2	-0.4	0.2	0.2	46	599	25	No Change
High needs		0.0	0.3	0.8	-0.5	0.0	0.0	74	253	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.9	-	-	-	-	0.5	-	116	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	0.0	1.1	-1.1	0.0	0.0	69	178	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		0.4	0.9	1.2	-0.3	0.2	0.2	36	570	25	No Change

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	162	162	100	Yes	162	162	100	Yes	162	162	100	Yes
High needs	90	90	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	51	51	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	55	55	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	157	157	100	Yes	157	157	100	Yes	157	157	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.