Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Whitman Middle

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Whitman Middle

Organization Information
District:Whitman-Hanson (07800000)School type:Middle School
School:Whitman Middle (07800310)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.7, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.7, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.1 83.5 88.7 5.2 94.8 95.6 4257150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 88 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.9, Target = 88 75 or Higher High needs 79.4 70.7 76.9 6.2 88.0 89.7 3317350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.1, Target = 77.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 82.1, Target = 77.7CPI = 82.1, Target = 77.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 75.7 75.7 82.1 6.4 77.7 87.9 42127100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.6, Target = 82.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 58.6, Target = 82.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 69.7 53.6 58.6 5.0 82.3 84.9 227350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 89.3, Target = 94.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.3, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher White 91.3 83.5 89.3 5.8 94.9 95.7 3352850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.5, Target = 84.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.5, Target = 84.1 75 or Higher All Students 72.8 71.4 77.5 6.1 84.1 86.4 4457150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.4, Target = 74.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 62.4, Target = 74.6 75 or Higher High needs 56.4 57.3 62.4 5.1 74.6 78.2 4617350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.1, Target = 66.5 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 68.1, Target = 66.5CPI = 68.1, Target = 66.575 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 63.4 63.4 68.1 4.7 66.5 81.7 50127100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 44.5, Target = 67.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 44.5, Target = 67.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 43.7 40.5 44.5 4.0 67.2 71.9 307350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 78.6, Target = 84.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 78.6, Target = 84.9 75 or Higher White 74.1 71.7 78.6 6.9 84.9 87.1 3852850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.1, Target = 83 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 76.1, Target = 83 75 or Higher All Students 70.9 66.5 76.1 9.6 83.0 85.5 5318050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.7, Target = 77.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 66.7, Target = 77.3 75 or Higher High needs 61.1 56.0 66.7 10.7 77.3 80.6 775450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.1, Target = 65.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 70.1, Target = 65.1CPI = 70.1, Target = 65.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 61.9 61.9 70.1 8.2 65.1 81.0 8041100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56, Target = 72.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 56, Target = 72.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 53.1 45.4 56.0 10.6 72.6 76.6 652150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 76.1, Target = 83.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 76.1, Target = 83.8 75 or Higher White 72.2 66.8 76.1 9.3 83.8 86.1 4016350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 5.3 10.357125 8.9 6.157125
High needs 1.6 8.117325 19.5 14.517325
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.2 10.212725 14.7 11.812725
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.47325 36.4 30.17325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 5.2 10.852825 8.5 5.552825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.2 16.657125 20.1 15.457125
High needs 3.3 9.217325 35.9 30.617325
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.7 12.612725 27.2 23.612725
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 1.3 0.0730 59.2 54.8730
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 8.3 16.752825 19.8 14.252825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.01800 15.4 8.318025
High needs 0.0 0.0540 24.2 14.85425
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0410 16.7 12.24125
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0210 33.3 23.82125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 0.0 0.01630 14.4 8.616325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 26.5 46.0 19.5 51.0Yes564100Above Target
High needsSGP = 42.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 25.0 42.5 17.5 51.0Yes168100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 24.0 43.5 19.5 51.0Yes122100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 30.0 41.0 11.0 51.0No7175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-3--
WhiteSGP = 45.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 26.0 45.5 19.5 51.0Yes524100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 30.0 39.0 9.0 51.0Yes56375On Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 30.0 35.0 5.0 51.0Yes16775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 31.0 35.0 4.0 51.0Yes12175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 33, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 33, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 25.5 33.0 7.5 51.0No7050Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-3--
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 29.5 40.0 10.5 51.0Yes52375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students59558799Yes59558799Yes184184100Yes
High needs18918698Yes18918698Yes5656100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged14013798Yes14013798Yes4343100Yes
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities7979100Yes7979100Yes2222100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian9---9---5---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.3---3---2---
White54754199Yes54754199Yes167167100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles