Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John H Duval
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - John H Duval
Organization Information
District:Whitman-Hanson (07800000)School type:Elementary School
School:John H Duval (07800030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.2 86.6 84.7 85.4 0.7 92.2 93.3 4927550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.6, Target = 85.4CPI = 75.6, Target = 85.4CPI = 75.6, Target = 85.4 75.0 72.9 75.6 2.7 85.4 87.5 488150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.1, Target = 79.6CPI = 84.1, Target = 79.6CPI = 84.1, Target = 79.6 77.7 77.7 84.1 6.4 79.6 88.9 8463100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85.7, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.7, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.7, Target = 92.4 87.0 84.7 85.7 1.0 92.4 93.5 3623450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86, Target = 90.3CPI = 86, Target = 90.3CPI = 86, Target = 90.3 83.4 85.6 86.0 0.4 90.3 91.7 5227450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 85.6CPI = 79.1, Target = 85.6CPI = 79.1, Target = 85.6 75.3 77.1 79.1 2.0 85.6 87.7 648050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.1, Target = 81.5CPI = 84.1, Target = 81.5CPI = 84.1, Target = 81.5 79.8 79.8 84.1 4.3 81.5 89.9 8263100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 86.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 86.1, Target = 90.6 83.9 86.5 86.1 -0.4 90.6 92.0 3923325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 71.4, Target = 84.8CPI = 71.4, Target = 84.8CPI = 71.4, Target = 84.8 74.0 82.4 71.4 -11.0 84.8 87.0 26960Declined
High needsCPI = 65.7, Target = 76.5CPI = 65.7, Target = 76.5CPI = 65.7, Target = 76.5 59.7- 65.7 -7.1 76.5 79.9 43270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 71.6, Target = 85.1CPI = 71.6, Target = 85.1CPI = 71.6, Target = 85.1 74.5 83.1 71.6 -11.5 85.1 87.3 11810Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.4 7.62750 5.5 7.62750
High needs 4.2 0.0810 18.1 18.5810
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 0.0630 12.5 9.56325
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 8.1 8.52340 5.2 6.82340
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.5 27.027425 4.3 7.32740
High needs 15.3 20.08025 11.1 15.0800
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.5 20.66325 7.0 9.5630
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 23.0 26.223325 3.2 6.92330
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.0 5.2960 7.7 11.5960
High needs 8.8 0.0270 8.8 14.8270
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 11.6 6.2810 7.0 11.1810
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 39.0 48.0 9.0 51.0Yes18275On Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 42.0 37.5 -4.5 51.0Yes5075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 42.5 53.0 10.5 51.0Yes4075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-3--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-0--
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 40.0 46.5 6.5 51.0Yes15675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 48.0 41.0 -7.0 51.0Yes18375On Target
High needsSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 45.0 38.5 -6.5 51.0Yes5075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 42.0 42.0 0.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-3--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 50.0 41.0 -9.0 51.0No15650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students28828198Yes28828097Yes1029997Yes
High needs898798Yes898697Yes323097Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged706999Yes706999Yes26---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities262596Yes26---10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.3---3---2---
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---4---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White24623997Yes24623897Yes868397Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles