Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mountview Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Mountview Middle

Organization Information

District:

Wachusett (07750000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Mountview Middle (07750305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.3	97.3	97.2	-0.1	97.8	98.2	94	762	100	Above Target
High needs		85.7	90.4	90.6	0.2	91.7	92.9	95	144	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		94.9	94.9	92.5	-2.4	95.3	97.5	92	70	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		91.7	-	-	-	-	95.9	-	27	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		82.2	86.7	85.9	-0.8	89.6	91.1	90	71	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		98.8	99.4	97.5	-1.9	99.3	99.4	66	30	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		94.2	96.8	94.8	-2.0	96.6	97.1	95	43	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		95.2	-	-	-	-	97.6	-	27	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.6	97.3	97.7	0.4	98.0	98.3	95	644	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.7	91.5	90.1	-1.4	92.2	93.4	88	762	75	On Target
High needs		64.2	77.1	75.7	-1.4	79.1	82.1	91	143	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.3	82.3	79.3	-3.0	83.8	91.2	91	70	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		85.7	-	-	-	-	92.9	-	27	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		58.9	70.3	67.1	-3.2	76.0	79.5	91	70	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		96.4	96.2	93.3	-2.9	97.9	98.2	50	30	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.7	84.6	75.0	-9.6	82.9	85.4	77	43	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		86.9	-	-	-	-	93.5	-	27	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.2	91.6	91.1	-0.5	92.5	93.6	86	644	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.6	87.6	86.4	-1.2	91.0	92.3	89	232	75	On Target
High needs		63.3	67.5	70.3	2.8	78.6	81.7	88	43	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.1	59.6	70.8	11.2	76.1	79.6	95	24	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.4	87.2	87.2	0.0	91.5	92.7	87	196	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.1	29.1	762	25	0.7	0.4	762	25
High needs	10.0	9.0	144	0	3.6	1.4	144	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.0	12.9	70	0	1.9	1.4	70	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.3	4.2	71	0	6.3	2.8	71	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	46.2	43.3	30	0	0.0	0.0	30	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	30.8	20.9	43	0	0.0	0.0	43	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	23.2	29.2	644	25	0.6	0.5	644	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	41.0	38.2	762	0	4.0	4.5	762	0
High needs	20.6	14.0	143	0	15.6	15.4	143	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	21.8	15.7	70	0	7.3	11.4	70	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Students w/ disabilities	17.7	11.4	70	0	24.1	22.9	70	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	59.0	46.7	30	0	0.0	6.7	30	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Hispanic/Latino	38.5	25.6	43	0	10.3	16.3	43	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	39.8	38.7	644	0	4.1	3.4	644	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.2	9.5	232	25	3.2	6.0	232	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	43	0	12.5	20.9	43	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	24	0	19.2	25.0	24	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.0	8.2	196	25	3.6	4.6	196	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	60.0	11.0	51.0	No	748	100	Above Target
High needs		51.0	60.0	9.0	51.0	No	139	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	58.0	8.0	51.0	No	69	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		51.0	59.0	8.0	51.0	No	68	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		68.0	64.0	-4.0	51.0	No	28	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		50.0	61.0	11.0	51.0	No	43	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		46.0	59.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	632	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	42.0	-7.0	51.0	No	749	50	Below Target
High needs		50.5	43.0	-7.5	51.0	No	139	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	37.0	-14.0	51.0	No	69	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.0	48.5	-4.5	51.0	No	68	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		56.0	63.5	7.5	51.0	No	28	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		42.0	48.0	6.0	51.0	No	43	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	41.0	-8.0	51.0	No	633	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	11.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	11.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	11.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	770	768	100	Yes	770	768	100	Yes	236	234	99	Yes
High needs	149	148	99	Yes	149	147	99	Yes	45	44	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	74	73	99	Yes	74	73	99	Yes	20	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	27	27	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	72	72	100	Yes	72	71	99	Yes	25	25	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	44	44	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	27	27	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	651	649	100	Yes	651	649	100	Yes	200	198	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.