Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Glenwood Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Glenwood Elementary School

Organization Information
District:Wachusett (07750000)School type:Elementary School
School:Glenwood Elementary School (07750060)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.1, Target = 95.8CPI = 90.1, Target = 95.8CPI = 90.1, Target = 95.8 92.8 88.1 90.1 2.0 95.8 96.4 7036550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.4, Target = 89.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 89.5CPI = 76.4, Target = 89.5 82.0 73.2 76.4 3.2 89.5 91.0 538950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.9, Target = 82.3CPI = 83.9, Target = 82.3CPI = 83.9, Target = 82.3 80.7 80.7 83.9 3.2 82.3 90.4 8342100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.9, Target = 85.6CPI = 68.9, Target = 85.6CPI = 68.9, Target = 85.6 75.3 67.8 68.9 1.1 85.6 87.7 625350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 95.9 93.0 88.2 89.7 1.5 95.9 96.5 6032550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.2, Target = 94.3CPI = 92.2, Target = 94.3CPI = 92.2, Target = 94.3 90.3 86.3 92.2 5.9 94.3 95.2 8136575On Target
High needsCPI = 81.2, Target = 88.6CPI = 81.2, Target = 88.6CPI = 81.2, Target = 88.6 80.5 72.7 81.2 8.5 88.6 90.3 728950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.1, Target = 79.7CPI = 85.1, Target = 79.7CPI = 85.1, Target = 79.7 77.9 77.9 85.1 7.2 79.7 89.0 8542100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.1, Target = 86.8CPI = 74.1, Target = 86.8CPI = 74.1, Target = 86.8 77.4 67.4 74.1 6.7 86.8 88.7 755350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.5, Target = 94.4CPI = 91.5, Target = 94.4CPI = 91.5, Target = 94.4 90.4 86.6 91.5 4.9 94.4 95.2 7232550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.5, Target = 91CPI = 91.5, Target = 91 84.6 85.6 91.5 5.9 91.0 92.3 8913275On Target
High needsCPI = 77.4, Target = 84.7CPI = 77.4, Target = 84.7CPI = 77.4, Target = 84.7 73.8 76.1 77.4 1.3 84.7 86.9 813150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 90.9CPI = 91.1, Target = 90.9 84.4 86.5 91.1 4.6 90.9 92.2 8111575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.8 20.336525 6.1 4.136525
High needs 1.8 6.78925 20.0 14.68925
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.3 11.94225 11.4 0.04225
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 1.2 1.95325 26.5 24.5530
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.1 19.132525 6.3 4.632525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 27.0 38.936525 5.6 2.536525
High needs 10.2 18.08925 17.6 9.08925
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.0 26.24225 16.3 2.44225
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 7.55325 23.2 15.15325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.5 37.232525 5.7 2.832525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.2 36.413225 6.4 2.313225
High needs 2.3 6.53125 15.9 9.73125
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.7 36.511525 5.4 2.611525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 54.0 57.5 3.5 51.0Yes23075On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 60.0 48.0 -12.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-27--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 35.0 40.0 5.0 51.0No2650Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 51.0 57.0 6.0 51.0Yes20875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51 40.0 68.5 28.5 51.0Yes230100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 34.5 53.0 18.5 51.0Yes49100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 37.0 55.0 18.0 51.0Yes27100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 25.0 51.5 26.5 51.0No26100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 39.0 68.0 29.0 51.0Yes208100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students37237099Yes37337199Yes13613599Yes
High needs929199Yes939299Yes333297Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4444100Yes4545100Yes16---
EL and Former EL11---11---5---
Students w/ disabilities555498Yes555498Yes19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---5---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino14---15---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---9---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White330329100Yes330329100Yes11911899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles