Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leroy E.Mayo
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Leroy E.Mayo
Organization Information
District:Wachusett (07750000)School type:Elementary School
School:Leroy E.Mayo (07750032)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.9 93.0 91.6 89.1 -2.5 95.9 96.5 6625225No Change
High needsCPI = 80.3, Target = 88CPI = 80.3, Target = 88CPI = 80.3, Target = 88 79.4 81.4 80.3 -1.1 88.0 89.7 717125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.6, Target = 84.5CPI = 83.6, Target = 84.5 83.1 83.1 83.6 0.5 84.5 91.6 822975On Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 85.8CPI = 75, Target = 85.8CPI = 75, Target = 85.8 75.7 72.3 75.0 2.7 85.8 87.9 773850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 96.2CPI = 89.1, Target = 96.2CPI = 89.1, Target = 96.2 93.5 91.9 89.1 -2.8 96.2 96.8 562140Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.3, Target = 93.8CPI = 89.3, Target = 93.8CPI = 89.3, Target = 93.8 89.4 90.4 89.3 -1.1 93.8 94.7 6725125No Change
High needsCPI = 76.4, Target = 87.1CPI = 76.4, Target = 87.1CPI = 76.4, Target = 87.1 77.9 79.7 76.4 -3.3 87.1 89.0 52710Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.9, Target = 89.9CPI = 81.9, Target = 89.9CPI = 81.9, Target = 89.9 89.0 89.0 81.9 -7.1 89.9 94.5 74290Declined
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.1, Target = 85.4CPI = 65.1, Target = 85.4CPI = 65.1, Target = 85.4 75.0 65.5 65.1 -0.4 85.4 87.5 523825No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.6, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.6, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.6, Target = 93.9 89.5 91.0 89.6 -1.4 93.9 94.8 6021325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 89.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 89.5, Target = 93.2 88.4 90.4 89.5 -0.9 93.2 94.2 818175On Target
High needsCPI = 72.5, Target = 91.3CPI = 72.5, Target = 91.3CPI = 72.5, Target = 91.3 85.0- 72.5 -9.8 91.3 92.5 67200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90, Target = 93.1CPI = 90, Target = 93.1CPI = 90, Target = 93.1 88.2 92.8 90.0 -2.8 93.1 94.1 767075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.0 16.72520 2.4 2.025225
High needs 2.7 5.67125 8.1 2.87125
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.9 10.32925 5.9 3.42925
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.63825 16.2 2.63825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.2 16.82140 2.3 1.921425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 36.4 31.52510 4.0 2.825125
High needs 18.9 14.1710 12.2 8.57125
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.4 31.0290 2.9 10.3290
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities 5.4 0.0380 21.6 13.23825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.1 31.02130 4.2 2.321325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.7 30.98125 2.5 2.5810
High needs 6.5 15.02025 3.2 10.0200
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.3 30.0700 3.0 2.9700
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 68.0 59.0 -9.0 51.0No16575On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 58.5 53.0 -5.5 51.0No5275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 68.0 58.0 -10.0 51.0No14575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 68.5 64.0 -4.5 51.0No165100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 49.5 57.0 7.5 51.0No5375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 67.0 63.5 -3.5 51.0No144100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students25725499Yes25725398Yes8181100Yes
High needs737299Yes737299Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged313097Yes313097Yes9---
EL and Former EL14---14---3---
Students w/ disabilities403998Yes403998Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian15---15---5---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21921699Yes21921598Yes7070100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles