Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Salisbury Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Salisbury Elementary

Organization Information
District:Triton (07730000)School type:Elementary School
School:Salisbury Elementary (07730015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 89.2CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.2CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.2 81.5 84.2 83.8 -0.4 89.2 90.8 4125025No Change
High needsCPI = 78.7, Target = 83.3CPI = 78.7, Target = 83.3CPI = 78.7, Target = 83.3 71.4 76.3 78.7 2.4 83.3 85.7 6512850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.1, Target = 80CPI = 80.1, Target = 80 78.2 78.2 80.1 1.9 80.0 89.1 6710775On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.2, Target = 75CPI = 62.2, Target = 75CPI = 62.2, Target = 75 57.1 60.4 62.2 1.8 75.0 78.6 444350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 84.7, Target = 90.1CPI = 84.7, Target = 90.1CPI = 84.7, Target = 90.1 83.1 85.3 84.7 -0.6 90.1 91.6 3122025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 80.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 80.6, Target = 90.6 83.9 81.1 80.6 -0.5 90.6 92.0 2925025No Change
High needsCPI = 73, Target = 85.7CPI = 73, Target = 85.7CPI = 73, Target = 85.7 75.5 72.2 73.0 0.8 85.7 87.8 3712750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.2, Target = 75.6CPI = 75.2, Target = 75.6 73.4 73.4 75.2 1.8 75.6 86.7 4410675On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.4, Target = 80.1CPI = 55.4, Target = 80.1CPI = 55.4, Target = 80.1 65.9 55.5 55.4 -0.1 80.1 83.0 234225No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.5, Target = 91.6CPI = 81.5, Target = 91.6CPI = 81.5, Target = 91.6 85.6 82.5 81.5 -1.0 91.6 92.8 1922025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.2, Target = 87.2CPI = 70.2, Target = 87.2CPI = 70.2, Target = 87.2 78.0 75.4 70.2 -5.2 87.2 89.0 23570Declined
High needsCPI = 58.3, Target = 79.8CPI = 58.3, Target = 79.8CPI = 58.3, Target = 79.8 65.4 69.6 58.3 -11.3 79.8 82.7 25270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 71.6, Target = 88.5CPI = 71.6, Target = 88.5CPI = 71.6, Target = 88.5 80.3 77.9 71.6 -6.3 88.5 90.2 11510Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.8 9.62500 3.8 6.82500
High needs 5.2 7.812825 7.8 10.21280
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 7.510725 6.4 9.31070
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 4.9 7.04325 19.5 23.3430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 9.0 9.52200 3.3 5.92200
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.0 22.82500 11.7 10.82500
High needs 13.0 15.012725 20.0 16.512725
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.9 15.11060 19.1 13.210625
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 7.14225 39.0 35.7420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.1 22.72200 10.0 9.52200
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 5.2 3.5570 8.6 15.8570
High needs 3.6 3.7270 14.3 25.9270
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.9 2.0510 7.8 13.7510
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 55.0 49.0 -6.0 51.0No16350Below Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 55.0 50.0 -5.0 51.0No7950Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 51.0 47.0 -4.0 51.0No6650Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 79.0 51.0 -28.0 51.0No2775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 55.0 49.0 -6.0 51.0No14750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 53.0 36.5 -16.5 51.0No16225Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 49.0 34.0 -15.0 51.0No7725Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 44.0 33.5 -10.5 51.0No6425Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 60.0 32.0 -28.0 51.0No2625Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-0--
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 53.0 34.0 -19.0 51.0No14725Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students26025698Yes25925598Yes5858100Yes
High needs13513499Yes13413299Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged11211199Yes11110998Yes22---
EL and Former EL8---8---1---
Students w/ disabilities4444100Yes444398Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---2---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White224223100Yes223222100Yes5252100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles