Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wire Village School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Wire Village School
Organization Information
District:Spencer-E Brookfield (07670000)School type:Elementary School
School:Wire Village School (07670040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.7, Target = 84.5CPI = 73.7, Target = 84.5CPI = 73.7, Target = 84.5 79.3 80.1 73.7 -6.4 84.5 89.7 132090Declined
High needsCPI = 64.1, Target = 78.8CPI = 64.1, Target = 78.8CPI = 64.1, Target = 78.8 71.7 69.0 64.1 -4.9 78.8 85.9 91030Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.1, Target = 72.3CPI = 67.1, Target = 72.3CPI = 67.1, Target = 72.3 69.8 69.8 67.1 -2.7 72.3 84.9 14760Declined
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 46.3, Target = 64.8CPI = 46.3, Target = 64.8CPI = 46.3, Target = 64.8 53.0 53.6 46.3 -7.3 64.8 76.5 9400Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 75.6, Target = 83.9CPI = 75.6, Target = 83.9CPI = 75.6, Target = 83.9 78.5 80.4 75.6 -4.8 83.9 89.3 71740Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76, Target = 83.6CPI = 76, Target = 83.6CPI = 76, Target = 83.6 78.1 75.9 76.0 0.1 83.6 89.1 1720850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.3, Target = 77.7CPI = 66.3, Target = 77.7CPI = 66.3, Target = 77.7 70.3 65.5 66.3 0.8 77.7 85.2 1610350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.8, Target = 69.8CPI = 67.8, Target = 69.8CPI = 67.8, Target = 69.8 67.1 67.1 67.8 0.7 69.8 83.6 197650Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.1, Target = 65.1CPI = 58.1, Target = 65.1CPI = 58.1, Target = 65.1 53.5 55.9 58.1 2.2 65.1 76.8 314050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.6, Target = 83.2CPI = 76.6, Target = 83.2CPI = 76.6, Target = 83.2 77.6 76.8 76.6 -0.2 83.2 88.8 917325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.1 2.92090 10.8 16.72090
High needs 2.2 0.01030 19.0 26.21030
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.8 0.0760 17.1 23.7760
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 1.8 0.0400 40.0 50.0400
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.6 3.41740 10.1 13.21740
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.5 14.42080 13.8 14.42080
High needs 7.3 9.710325 23.4 22.31030
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.2 9.27625 21.6 18.47625
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 5.5 7.54025 34.5 35.0400
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.7 14.51730 12.1 13.91730
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 43.5 40.0 -3.5 51.0No10725Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 38.0 32.0 -6.0 51.0No5725Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 34.5 34.0 -0.5 51.0No4125Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 41.0 26.0 -15.0 51.0No220Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 41.5 39.0 -2.5 51.0No8725Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 55.0 56.0 1.0 51.0No10775On Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 49.0 57.0 8.0 51.0No5775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 48.0 51.0 3.0 51.0No4175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 49.5 60.0 10.5 51.0Yes22100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 57.0 56.0 -1.0 51.0No8775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students216216100Yes215215100Yes----
High needs108108100Yes108108100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged8181100Yes8181100Yes----
EL and Former EL6---6-------
Students w/ disabilities4040100Yes4040100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino18---18-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White178178100Yes177177100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles