Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Brookfield Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - East Brookfield Elementary
Organization Information
District:Spencer-E Brookfield (07670000)School type:Elementary School
School:East Brookfield Elementary (07670008)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 85.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 85.8, Target = 90.1 83.1 84.9 85.8 0.9 90.1 91.6 5010050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.8, Target = 83.5CPI = 77.8, Target = 83.5CPI = 77.8, Target = 83.5 71.7 76.5 77.8 1.3 83.5 85.9 615450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.4, Target = 85.5CPI = 86.4, Target = 85.5 84.2 84.2 86.4 2.2 85.5 92.1 893375On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.8, Target = 74.5CPI = 68.8, Target = 74.5CPI = 68.8, Target = 74.5 56.3 65.2 68.8 3.6 74.5 78.2 623250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.8, Target = 90.6CPI = 87.8, Target = 90.6CPI = 87.8, Target = 90.6 83.9 84.8 87.8 3.0 90.6 92.0 488450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.3, Target = 86.2CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.2CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.2 76.4 85.1 83.3 -1.8 86.2 88.2 4110025No Change
High needsCPI = 73.6, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.6, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.6, Target = 80.6 66.8 76.5 73.6 -2.9 80.6 83.4 40540Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.8, Target = 82.4CPI = 81.8, Target = 82.4 80.8 80.8 81.8 1.0 82.4 90.4 733375On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.4, Target = 70.8CPI = 66.4, Target = 70.8CPI = 66.4, Target = 70.8 50.0 67.9 66.4 -1.5 70.8 75.0 553225No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.8, Target = 86.1CPI = 84.8, Target = 86.1CPI = 84.8, Target = 86.1 76.2 85.6 84.8 -0.8 86.1 88.1 328425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.4, Target = 87.2CPI = 76.4, Target = 87.2CPI = 76.4, Target = 87.2 78.1 70.8 76.4 5.6 87.2 89.1 373550Improved Below Target
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  78.1---- 89.1-29--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.5 6.01000 8.3 7.010025
High needs 2.0 1.9540 12.2 13.0540
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 3.0330 6.7 0.03325
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.13225 21.4 21.9320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.4 6.08425 8.7 4.88425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.1 23.01000 6.4 9.01000
High needs 12.2 9.3540 14.3 16.7540
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.7 12.1330 3.3 6.1330
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 3.1320 25.0 28.1320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.6 22.6840 6.5 7.1840
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 11.43525 4.2 14.3350
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--29---29-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 38.0 39.0 1.0 51.0No7050Below Target
High needsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 32.0 34.5 2.5 51.0No3250Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 38.5 38.0 -0.5 51.0Yes5975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 58.0 38.0 -20.0 51.0No7025Below Target
High needsSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 49.0 31.5 -17.5 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 59.0 34.0 -25.0 51.0No5925Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students102102100Yes102102100Yes3535100Yes
High needs5555100Yes5555100Yes15---
Econ. Disadvantaged3434100Yes3434100Yes8---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino9---9---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8686100Yes8686100Yes2929100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles