Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bernardston Elementary
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bernardston Elementary
Organization Information
District:Pioneer Valley (07500000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bernardston Elementary (07500006)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.6, Target = 88.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 81.6, Target = 88.3 75 or Higher All Students 79.9 84.9 81.6 -3.3 88.3 90.0 32950Declined
High needsCPI = 76.3, Target = 81.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.3, Target = 81.6 75 or Higher High needs 68.5 77.4 76.3 -1.1 81.6 84.3 533925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.3, Target = 86.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 84.3, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 84.8 84.8 84.3 -0.5 86.1 92.4 852725No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.3, Target = 88.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 81.3, Target = 88.3 75 or Higher White 80.0 83.6 81.3 -2.3 88.3 90.0 178425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.7, Target = 85.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.7, Target = 85.9 75 or Higher All Students 75.9 82.9 83.7 0.8 85.9 88.0 429550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.6, Target = 78.1 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 77.6, Target = 78.175 or Higher High needs 62.5 75.6 77.6 2.0 78.1 81.3 573975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.2, Target = 85.2 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 85.2, Target = 85.275 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.9 83.9 85.2 1.3 85.2 92.0 862775On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.4, Target = 86.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.4, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher White 76.2 81.7 82.4 0.7 86.1 88.1 228450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.4, Target = 84.3 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 84.4, Target = 84.375 or Higher All Students 73.0 70.5 84.4 13.9 84.3 86.5 622475On Target
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.9 6.3950 5.9 7.4950
High needs 7.1 7.7390 14.3 17.9390
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 11.12725 7.1 14.8270
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.6 6.0840 6.7 7.1840
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.8 18.9950 7.9 5.39525
High needs 28.6 17.9390 16.7 10.33925
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.9 25.9270 7.1 7.4270
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.3 19.0840 8.9 6.08425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.1 25.02425 13.6 12.5240
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 50.0 38.5 -11.5 51.0No7025Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-28--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 42.5 41.5 -1.0 51.0No6450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 50.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.0 50.5 -5.5 51.0No7075On Target
High needsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 54.0 47.5 -6.5 51.0Yes2875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 50.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 58.0 50.5 -7.5 51.0No6475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9696100Yes9696100Yes2424100Yes
High needs4040100Yes4040100Yes12---
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes11---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino1---1-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8585100Yes8585100Yes18---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles