Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pentucket Regional Middle
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Pentucket Regional Middle
Organization Information
District:Pentucket (07450000)School type:Middle School
School:Pentucket Regional Middle (07450405)Grades served:07,08
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93, Target = 95.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93, Target = 95.9 75 or Higher All Students 93.0 95.7 93.0 -2.7 95.9 96.5 644770Declined
High needsCPI = 83.5, Target = 88 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 83.5, Target = 88 75 or Higher High needs 79.5 88.5 83.5 -5.0 88.0 89.8 711270Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.8, Target = 92.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 90.8, Target = 92.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 92.3 92.3 90.8 -1.5 92.9 96.2 855725No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79, Target = 84.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 79, Target = 84.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 73.8 85.9 79.0 -6.9 84.7 86.9 79870Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 96 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.1, Target = 96 75 or Higher White 93.2 95.7 93.1 -2.6 96.0 96.6 574540Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.2, Target = 87.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 79.2, Target = 87.1 75 or Higher All Students 77.9 79.2 79.2 0.0 87.1 89.0 5147225No Change
High needsCPI = 60.4, Target = 70.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 60.4, Target = 70.6 75 or Higher High needs 49.6 61.1 60.4 -0.7 70.6 74.8 3712325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70, Target = 72.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 70, Target = 72.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 70.2 70.2 70.0 -0.2 72.7 85.1 585525No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.2, Target = 66.5 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 53.2, Target = 66.5 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 42.6 53.4 53.2 -0.2 66.5 71.3 628525No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.4, Target = 87.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 79.4, Target = 87.3 75 or Higher White 78.3 79.1 79.4 0.3 87.3 89.2 4144850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.2, Target = 86.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 75.2, Target = 86.4 75 or Higher All Students 76.6 73.5 75.2 1.7 86.4 88.3 5124750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 61.9, Target = 74.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 61.9, Target = 74.1 75 or Higher High needs 55.6 57.0 61.9 4.9 74.1 77.8 556550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.7, Target = 68.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 72.7, Target = 68.6CPI = 72.7, Target = 68.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 65.7 65.7 72.7 7.0 68.6 82.9 8832100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52.9, Target = 71.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 52.9, Target = 71.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 51.0 49.4 52.9 3.5 71.4 75.5 564350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 75.5, Target = 86.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 75.5, Target = 86.6 75 or Higher White 77.0 73.7 75.5 1.8 86.6 88.5 3724050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.5 18.44770 0.9 1.94770
High needs 4.9 7.912725 2.5 4.71270
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.8 14.05725 0.0 0.05725
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 2.3870 3.8 6.9870
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.2 19.44540 0.9 2.04540
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 21.247225 10.5 14.24720
High needs 0.8 6.512325 24.6 34.11230
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.9 7.35525 13.5 23.6550
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.78525 33.8 41.2850
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.3 21.244825 10.8 14.34480
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.8 4.524725 11.0 8.124725
High needs 0.0 1.56525 29.5 23.16525
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 3.13225 14.8 3.13225
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0430 41.0 34.94325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.9 4.624025 11.1 7.924025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 52.0 40.0 -12.0 51.0No46325Below Target
High needsSGP = 36.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 54.0 36.5 -17.5 51.0No12225Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 50.0 45.0 -5.0 51.0No5750Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 58.5 34.5 -24.0 51.0No8225Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 51.0 40.0 -11.0 51.0No44125Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 36.0 46.0 10.0 51.0No45875On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 37.0 44.0 7.0 51.0No11850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 44, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 26.0 44.0 18.0 51.0Yes55100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 48.5 44.5 -4.0 51.0No8050Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 36.0 45.0 9.0 51.0No43550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students49547997Yes49547496Yes25024799Yes
High needs13412896Yes13412493No676597Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged615794No615593No3232100Yes
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities898798Yes898596Yes454396Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---1---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino9---9---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White47045597Yes47044996Yes24324099Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles