Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Helen R Donaghue School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Helen R Donaghue School

Organization Information
District:Pentucket (07450000)School type:Elementary School
School:Helen R Donaghue School (07450010)Grades served:03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 82.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 82.2, Target = 93.9 89.5 88.9 82.2 -6.7 93.9 94.8 342690Declined
High needsCPI = 65, Target = 87.7CPI = 65, Target = 87.7CPI = 65, Target = 87.7 78.9 76.1 65.0 -11.1 87.7 89.5 11900Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.7, Target = 77.5CPI = 64.7, Target = 77.5CPI = 64.7, Target = 77.5 75.5 75.5 64.7 -10.8 77.5 87.8 10510Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.8, Target = 85.6CPI = 59.8, Target = 85.6CPI = 59.8, Target = 85.6 75.3 71.5 59.8 -11.7 85.6 87.7 35660Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.6, Target = 93.7CPI = 82.6, Target = 93.7CPI = 82.6, Target = 93.7 89.2 88.9 82.6 -6.3 93.7 94.6 212460Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.9, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.9, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.9, Target = 89.6 82.2 77.7 77.9 0.2 89.6 91.1 2126950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 60.1, Target = 83.1CPI = 60.1, Target = 83.1CPI = 60.1, Target = 83.1 71.1 61.2 60.1 -1.1 83.1 85.6 58925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 58, Target = 65.9CPI = 58, Target = 65.9CPI = 58, Target = 65.9 62.8 62.8 58.0 -4.8 65.9 81.4 4500Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.2, Target = 82CPI = 57.2, Target = 82CPI = 57.2, Target = 82 69.1 53.5 57.2 3.7 82.0 84.6 286650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.8, Target = 89.6CPI = 78.8, Target = 89.6CPI = 78.8, Target = 89.6 82.2 78.1 78.8 0.7 89.6 91.1 1224650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 74.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 74.2, Target = 92.6 87.3 72.1 74.2 2.1 92.6 93.7 326450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 61.3, Target = 84.9CPI = 61.3, Target = 84.9CPI = 61.3, Target = 84.9 74.1- 61.3 -8.7 84.9 87.1 30200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 72, Target = 92.4CPI = 72, Target = 92.4CPI = 72, Target = 92.4 86.9 72.8 72.0 -0.8 92.4 93.5 125925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.7 10.82690 3.1 8.22690
High needs 4.3 3.3900 8.5 22.2900
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.1 5.95125 8.5 23.5510
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 4.7 0.0660 12.5 25.8660
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.3 9.82460 2.6 7.72460
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.4 14.12690 11.0 12.32690
High needs 5.3 3.4890 27.7 32.6890
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 4.0500 23.4 34.0500
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 4.7 1.5660 37.5 37.9660
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.6 14.22460 10.1 11.42460
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.6 3.16425 9.0 12.5640
High needs 3.3 0.0200 16.7 30.0200
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.0 3.45925 9.0 13.6590
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 61.0 44.0 -17.0 51.0No19650Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 55.0 37.0 -18.0 51.0No6025Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 45.0 38.0 -7.0 51.0No3125Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 62.0 32.0 -30.0 51.0No4125Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 62.5 43.0 -19.5 51.0No17750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 32.0 32.0 0.0 51.0No19725Below Target
High needsSGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51 27.0 25.0 -2.0 51.0No590Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 27.5 27.0 -0.5 51.0No300Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51 24.0 24.0 0.0 51.0No410Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 32.0 32.0 0.0 51.0No17825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27827197Yes27827197Yes6464100Yes
High needs949197Yes949096Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged555295Yes555194No10---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities686799Yes686799Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino13---13---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White25424898Yes25424898Yes5959100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles