Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Elmer S Bagnall
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Elmer S Bagnall
Organization Information
District:Pentucket (07450000)School type:Elementary School
School:Elmer S Bagnall (07450005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 95.8CPI = 85.6, Target = 95.8CPI = 85.6, Target = 95.8 92.8 86.1 85.6 -0.5 95.8 96.4 5030825No Change
High needsCPI = 64.5, Target = 91CPI = 64.5, Target = 91CPI = 64.5, Target = 91 84.6 72.5 64.5 -8.0 91.0 92.3 10830Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.2, Target = 75.8CPI = 67.2, Target = 75.8CPI = 67.2, Target = 75.8 73.6 73.6 67.2 -6.4 75.8 86.8 15290Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.8, Target = 88.9CPI = 60.8, Target = 88.9CPI = 60.8, Target = 88.9 80.9 68.7 60.8 -7.9 88.9 90.5 40600Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.3, Target = 95.9CPI = 85.3, Target = 95.9CPI = 85.3, Target = 95.9 93.0 86.1 85.3 -0.8 95.9 96.5 3429425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.8, Target = 92.8CPI = 78.8, Target = 92.8CPI = 78.8, Target = 92.8 87.6 76.5 78.8 2.3 92.8 93.8 2331250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 56.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 56.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 56.5, Target = 87.2 78.0 60.2 56.5 -3.7 87.2 89.0 3840Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 60.8, Target = 71.5CPI = 60.8, Target = 71.5CPI = 60.8, Target = 71.5 68.9 68.9 60.8 -8.1 71.5 84.5 5300Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.8, Target = 84.2CPI = 50.8, Target = 84.2CPI = 50.8, Target = 84.2 72.9 55.2 50.8 -4.4 84.2 86.5 15600Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 78.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 78.9, Target = 92.8 87.7 76.5 78.9 2.4 92.8 93.9 1229850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.5, Target = 90.2CPI = 70.5, Target = 90.2CPI = 70.5, Target = 90.2 83.2 78.1 70.5 -7.6 90.2 91.6 24780Declined
High needsCPI = 57.6, Target = 86CPI = 57.6, Target = 86CPI = 57.6, Target = 86 76.0 65.4 57.6 -7.8 86.0 88.0 23230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 71.4, Target = 90.3CPI = 71.4, Target = 90.3CPI = 71.4, Target = 90.3 83.4 78.2 71.4 -6.8 90.3 91.7 11760Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.9 16.930825 6.7 7.53080
High needs 5.0 2.4830 18.0 26.5830
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.8 3.42925 13.9 24.1290
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 5.3 1.7600 22.7 31.7600
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.4 16.729425 6.7 7.52940
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.8 22.131225 12.1 11.93120
High needs 3.9 8.38425 29.1 34.5840
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.7 16.73025 13.5 33.3300
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.9 3.3600 35.1 38.3600
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.4 22.529825 12.5 11.72980
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.0 5.1780 5.6 17.9780
High needs 3.8 4.32325 19.2 43.5230
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.5 5.3760 5.8 17.1760
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 53.0 46.0 -7.0 51.0No22750Below Target
High needsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 51.0 33.5 -17.5 51.0No6225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 51.0 42.5 -8.5 51.0No4650Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 52.0 45.0 -7.0 51.0No21950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 29.0 41.0 12.0 51.0Yes23575On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 30.0 32.0 2.0 51.0No6550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 30.0 33.5 3.5 51.0No4850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 29.0 41.0 12.0 51.0Yes22775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students32231297Yes32231698Yes817998Yes
High needs918594No918695Yes252396Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged333094No333196Yes9---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities666193No666194No19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino7---7-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White30729897Yes30730298Yes797797Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles