Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Old Rochester Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Old Rochester Regional High

Organization Information
District:Old Rochester (07400000)School type:High School
School:Old Rochester Regional High (07400505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.3, Target = 98CPI = 99.3, Target = 98CPI = 99.3, Target = 98 96.5 99.1 99.3 0.2 98.0 98.3 78200100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.7, Target = 91.1CPI = 96.7, Target = 91.1CPI = 96.7, Target = 91.1 84.8 95.0 96.7 1.7 91.1 92.4 6945100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  92.5---- 96.3-33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 99.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 99.2, Target = 97.8 96.3 99.0 99.2 0.2 97.8 98.2 62183100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.3, Target = 96.7 94.4 95.3 95.3 0.0 96.7 97.2 6820025No Change
High needsCPI = 83.9, Target = 87.9CPI = 83.9, Target = 87.9CPI = 83.9, Target = 87.9 79.3 82.6 83.9 1.3 87.9 89.7 574550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  90.0---- 95.0-34--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.2, Target = 97CPI = 96.2, Target = 97 94.9 96.2 96.2 0.0 97.0 97.5 6818375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.9, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.9, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.9, Target = 94.9 91.2 93.6 91.9 -1.7 94.9 95.6 4819525No Change
High needsCPI = 78.4, Target = 88.3CPI = 78.4, Target = 88.3CPI = 78.4, Target = 88.3 80.0 85.9 78.4 -7.5 88.3 90.0 26440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  64.4---- 82.2-32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 94.9CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.9CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.9 91.2 93.9 93.1 -0.8 94.9 95.6 4218025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 53.0 55.02000 0.5 0.52000
High needs 25.7 17.8450 2.9 2.24525
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--33---33-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 53.9 57.41830 0.6 0.518325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 63.1 64.02000 2.7 1.520025
High needs 38.9 22.2450 11.1 6.74525
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--34---34-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 65.7 65.61830 2.4 1.118325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 33.7 22.61950 0.6 0.019525
High needs 18.8 11.4440 3.1 0.04425
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--32---32-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.8 23.31800 0.6 0.018025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 37.0 46.5 9.5 51.0No18675On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 33.0 52.0 19.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 37.0 46.0 9.0 51.0No17150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 42.0 50.0 8.0 51.0No18550Below Target
High needsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 43.5 49.5 6.0 51.0No3850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 42.0 50.0 8.0 51.0No17050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80 93.4 95.7 2.3 80.0 90.0184100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.9, Target = 80 85.1 90.9 5.8 80.0 90.04475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.026--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.08--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80 94.2 97.1 2.9 80.0 90.0170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 85 95.3 94.6 -0.7 85.0 95.016675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 85 83.8 89.4 5.6 85.0 95.04775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.017--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.04--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.8, Target = 85 96.1 94.8 -1.3 85.0 95.015575On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 0.4 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.47178550Improved Below Target
High needsDropout Rate = 1.4, Target = 1.9 3.3 3.8 1.4 2.4 1.9 1.75914875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------61--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 2, Target = 2.3 4.0 4.1 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.052102--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.46772375On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students10
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students20620399Yes20620399Yes206205100Yes
High needs474698Yes474698Yes474698Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---17---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities353497Yes3535100Yes353497Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2---2---
Asian7---7---7---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---5---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18818699Yes18818699Yes188188100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles