Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Old Rochester Regional Jr High

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Old Rochester Regional Jr High

Organization Information
District:Old Rochester (07400000)School type:Middle School
School:Old Rochester Regional Jr High (07400405)Grades served:07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 97.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94.3, Target = 97.8 75 or Higher All Students 96.3 95.7 94.3 -1.4 97.8 98.2 7644025No Change
High needsCPI = 81.4, Target = 92.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 81.4, Target = 92.9 75 or Higher High needs 87.9 88.0 81.4 -6.6 92.9 94.0 56980Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.5, Target = 93.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 83.5, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 92.8 92.8 83.5 -9.3 93.4 96.4 48470Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.6, Target = 89.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 74.6, Target = 89.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 82.5 81.0 74.6 -6.4 89.8 91.3 66640Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.7, Target = 98 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.7, Target = 98 75 or Higher White 96.5 96.2 94.7 -1.5 98.0 98.3 7140425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86, Target = 89 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86, Target = 89 75 or Higher All Students 81.1 88.5 86.0 -2.5 89.0 90.6 7444425No Change
High needsCPI = 67.1, Target = 75.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 67.1, Target = 75.7 75 or Higher High needs 58.3 73.5 67.1 -6.4 75.7 79.2 66980Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.9, Target = 82.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 73.9, Target = 82.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 81.1 81.1 73.9 -7.2 82.7 90.6 73470Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.2, Target = 71 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 58.2, Target = 71 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 50.3 63.7 58.2 -5.5 71.0 75.2 76640Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 89.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.7, Target = 89.3 75 or Higher White 81.6 88.9 86.7 -2.2 89.3 90.8 7340625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.2, Target = 87.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 79.2, Target = 87.2 75 or Higher All Students 78.0 81.3 79.2 -2.1 87.2 89.0 6721525No Change
High needsCPI = 67.8, Target = 80.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 67.8, Target = 80.4 75 or Higher High needs 66.4 67.4 67.8 0.4 80.4 83.2 803850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.5, Target = 76.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 62.5, Target = 76.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 60.0 61.8 62.5 0.7 76.7 80.0 862450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.9, Target = 87.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 79.9, Target = 87.5 75 or Higher White 78.6 81.7 79.9 -1.8 87.5 89.3 6019925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.0 18.24400 1.6 1.84400
High needs 12.0 8.2980 6.5 6.1980
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.3 14.9470 5.8 6.4470
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 7.5 1.6640 10.4 9.4640
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.6 18.34040 1.0 1.74040
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.6 28.644425 4.2 8.64440
High needs 8.7 9.2980 15.5 27.6980
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.2 10.64725 10.2 17.0470
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 7.8 4.7640 23.4 39.1640
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 29.140625 4.0 8.44060
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.2 2.821525 5.3 7.02150
High needs 0.0 2.63825 15.9 18.4380
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0240 21.1 29.2240
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.3 2.519925 4.4 6.51990
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 43.0 34.0 -9.0 51.0No42025Below Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 45.5 35.0 -10.5 51.0No8925Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 23.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 23.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 41.0 23.5 -17.5 51.0No420Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 41.0 38.0 -3.0 51.0No5725Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 44.0 34.0 -10.0 51.0No38825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 51.0 36.5 -14.5 51.0No42025Below Target
High needsSGP = 28, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 28, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 51.5 28.0 -23.5 51.0No890Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 23, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 23, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 52.0 23.0 -29.0 51.0No420Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 50.0 34.0 -16.0 51.0No5725Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 50.0 37.0 -13.0 51.0No38625Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students46144597Yes46144997Yes22021799Yes
High needs10410197Yes10410197Yes403998Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged525096Yes525096Yes20---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities696696Yes696696Yes252496Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---4---
Afr. Amer./Black12---12---4---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White42240997Yes42241197Yes20320199Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles