Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Luther Burbank Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Luther Burbank Middle School
Organization Information
District:Nashoba (07250000)School type:Middle School
School:Luther Burbank Middle School (07250305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.3, Target = 96.7 94.3 94.8 95.3 0.5 96.7 97.2 8424375On Target
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 91.1 84.7 85.4 82.9 -2.5 91.1 92.4 665725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.9, Target = 88.4CPI = 77.9, Target = 88.4CPI = 77.9, Target = 88.4 80.1 79.0 77.9 -1.1 88.4 90.1 764325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.1 95.0 94.7 95.4 0.7 97.1 97.5 7822275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.6, Target = 92.4CPI = 91.6, Target = 92.4 87.0 91.8 91.6 -0.2 92.4 93.5 92242100Above Target
High needsCPI = 73.2, Target = 83.5CPI = 73.2, Target = 83.5CPI = 73.2, Target = 83.5 71.7 75.8 73.2 -2.6 83.5 85.9 87570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.1, Target = 79CPI = 65.1, Target = 79CPI = 65.1, Target = 79 64.0 65.3 65.1 -0.2 79.0 82.0 884325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 92.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 92.5, Target = 92.4 87.0 93.0 92.5 -0.5 92.4 93.5 94221100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 90.2CPI = 87.5, Target = 90.2CPI = 87.5, Target = 90.2 83.2 85.1 87.5 2.4 90.2 91.6 9172100Above Target
High needsCPI = 68.8, Target = 81.9CPI = 68.8, Target = 81.9CPI = 68.8, Target = 81.9 69.0 68.5 68.8 0.3 81.9 84.5 832050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 88.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 88.2, Target = 91.1 84.7 85.3 88.2 2.9 91.1 92.4 9168100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.1 32.524325 2.0 3.32430
High needs 10.8 7.0570 4.6 14.0570
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 2.3 2.3430 6.8 18.6430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 26.7 33.322225 2.3 3.22220
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 47.4 52.12420 5.6 6.22420
High needs 21.5 21.1570 20.0 26.3570
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 11.4 9.3430 29.5 34.9430
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 48.9 54.822125 4.1 5.42210
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.7 6.97225 6.1 5.6720
High needs 0.0 0.0200 18.5 20.0200
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.9 5.96825 5.9 4.46825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 59.0 65.0 6.0 51.0Yes231100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 47.0 57.5 10.5 51.0Yes4875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 47.0 41.0 -6.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 59.0 65.0 6.0 51.0Yes212100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 65.0 61.5 -3.5 51.0No230100Above Target
High needsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 61.0 54.5 -6.5 51.0No4875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 52.5 53.0 0.5 51.0No3575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 65.0 61.0 -4.0 51.0No211100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students247247100Yes248247100Yes757499Yes
High needs6060100Yes6060100Yes2121100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged27---27---8---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities4545100Yes4545100Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White223223100Yes224223100Yes706999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles