Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Luther Burbank Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Luther Burbank Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Nashoba (07250000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Luther Burbank Middle School (07250305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.3	94.8	95.3	0.5	96.7	97.2	84	243	75	On Target
High needs		84.7	85.4	82.9	-2.5	91.1	92.4	66	57	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		80.1	79.0	77.9	-1.1	88.4	90.1	76	43	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		95.0	94.7	95.4	0.7	97.1	97.5	78	222	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.0	91.8	91.6	-0.2	92.4	93.5	92	242	100	Above Target
High needs		71.7	75.8	73.2	-2.6	83.5	85.9	87	57	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.0	65.3	65.1	-0.2	79.0	82.0	88	43	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		87.0	93.0	92.5	-0.5	92.4	93.5	94	221	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.2	85.1	87.5	2.4	90.2	91.6	91	72	100	Above Target
High needs		69.0	68.5	68.8	0.3	81.9	84.5	83	20	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.7	85.3	88.2	2.9	91.1	92.4	91	68	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.1	32.5	243	25	2.0	3.3	243	0
High needs	10.8	7.0	57	0	4.6	14.0	57	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.3	2.3	43	0	6.8	18.6	43	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	26.7	33.3	222	25	2.3	3.2	222	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	47.4	52.1	242	0	5.6	6.2	242	0
High needs	21.5	21.1	57	0	20.0	26.3	57	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	11.4	9.3	43	0	29.5	34.9	43	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	48.9	54.8	221	25	4.1	5.4	221	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.7	6.9	72	25	6.1	5.6	72	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	20	0	18.5	20.0	20	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.9	5.9	68	25	5.9	4.4	68	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	65.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	231	100	Above Target
High needs		47.0	57.5	10.5	51.0	Yes	48	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	41.0	-6.0	51.0	Yes	35	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		59.0	65.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	212	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	61.5	-3.5	51.0	No	230	100	Above Target
High needs		61.0	54.5	-6.5	51.0	No	48	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		52.5	53.0	0.5	51.0	No	35	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		65.0	61.0	-4.0	51.0	No	211	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	247	247	100	Yes	248	247	100	Yes	75	74	99	Yes
High needs	60	60	100	Yes	60	60	100	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	27	-	-	-	27	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	45	45	100	Yes	45	45	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	223	223	100	Yes	224	223	100	Yes	70	69	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.