Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Narragansett Regional High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Narragansett Regional High
Organization Information
District:Narragansett (07200000)School type:High School
School:Narragansett Regional High (07200505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.8, Target = 96.9CPI = 93.8, Target = 96.9CPI = 93.8, Target = 96.9 94.6 95.8 93.8 -2.0 96.9 97.3 159725No Change
High needsCPI = 81.9, Target = 91.5CPI = 81.9, Target = 91.5CPI = 81.9, Target = 91.5 85.4 91.4 81.9 -9.5 91.5 92.7 3290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.1, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.1, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.1, Target = 96.9 94.7 96.1 95.1 -1.0 96.9 97.4 68625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 94.8CPI = 85.6, Target = 94.8CPI = 85.6, Target = 94.8 91.0 87.7 85.6 -2.1 94.8 95.5 249725No Change
High needsCPI = 69, Target = 90.6CPI = 69, Target = 90.6CPI = 69, Target = 90.6 83.9 76.7 69.0 -7.7 90.6 92.0 9290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.8, Target = 94.9CPI = 87.8, Target = 94.9CPI = 87.8, Target = 94.9 91.2 88.0 87.8 -0.2 94.9 95.6 138625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 94.5CPI = 90.2, Target = 94.5CPI = 90.2, Target = 94.5 90.5 88.9 90.2 1.3 94.5 95.3 398750Improved Below Target
High needs -------22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.4CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.4CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.4 90.4 89.0 92.4 3.4 94.4 95.2 377950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 48.8 42.3970 2.4 6.2970
High needs 28.1 6.9290 6.3 17.2290
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.0 44.2860 2.6 4.7860
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.6 45.49725 7.2 7.2970
High needs 13.3 20.72925 20.0 20.7290
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.3 48.88625 6.7 4.78625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.6 25.3870 3.7 2.38725
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.4 27.8790 2.7 0.07925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 64.0 54.5 -9.5 51.0No9275On Target
High needs --- 51.0-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 64.0 55.0 -9.0 51.0No8475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0No9150Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0No8350Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 80 95.3 94.6 -0.7 80.0 90.09275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.3, Target = 80 83.7 90.3 6.6 80.0 90.03175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.013--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.3, Target = 80 94.8 95.3 0.5 80.0 90.085100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 85 93.4 98.8 5.4 85.0 95.086100Above Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.020--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.09--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.01--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85 93.8 98.7 4.9 85.0 95.077100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1, Target = 0.6 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.65238225No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 1.9, Target = 0.9 1.5 2.5 1.9 0.6 0.9 0.85210550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------74--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.1, Target = 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.1 -0.5 0.6 0.63835425No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students10
High needs10
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students101101100Yes101101100Yes101101100Yes
High needs3131100Yes3131100Yes31---
Econ. Disadvantaged18---18---18---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities19---19---19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8989100Yes8989100Yes8989100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles