Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Manchester Essex Regional Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Manchester Essex Regional Middle School
Organization Information
District:Manchester Essex Regional (06980000)School type:Middle School
School:Manchester Essex Regional Middle School (06980030)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.1, Target = 98.4CPI = 94.1, Target = 98.4CPI = 94.1, Target = 98.4 97.2 96.8 94.1 -2.7 98.4 98.6 733740Declined
High needsCPI = 84.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 84.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 84.9, Target = 93.6 89.1 88.3 84.9 -3.4 93.6 94.6 76780Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 98.1, Target = 99.3CPI = 98.1, Target = 99.3CPI = 98.1, Target = 99.3 99.2 99.2 98.1 -1.1 99.3 99.6 9927100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.1, Target = 92CPI = 80.1, Target = 92CPI = 80.1, Target = 92 86.2 81.8 80.1 -1.7 92.0 93.1 815425No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94, Target = 98.4CPI = 94, Target = 98.4CPI = 94, Target = 98.4 97.2 96.9 94.0 -2.9 98.4 98.6 633580Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.3, Target = 94.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 94.8CPI = 86.3, Target = 94.8 91.1 89.2 86.3 -2.9 94.8 95.6 763750Declined
High needsCPI = 69.2, Target = 85.1CPI = 69.2, Target = 85.1CPI = 69.2, Target = 85.1 74.4 75.0 69.2 -5.8 85.1 87.2 76780Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.8, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.8, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.8, Target = 89.6 88.7 88.7 77.8 -10.9 89.6 94.4 86270Declined
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 64.8, Target = 82.8CPI = 64.8, Target = 82.8 70.5 67.9 64.8 -3.1 82.8 85.3 87540Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.4, Target = 94.8CPI = 86.4, Target = 94.8CPI = 86.4, Target = 94.8 91.1 89.2 86.4 -2.8 94.8 95.6 713590Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88, Target = 95CPI = 88, Target = 95CPI = 88, Target = 95 91.4 88.6 88.0 -0.6 95.0 95.7 93117100Above Target
High needs  81.3---- 90.7-28--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.5, Target = 95CPI = 88.5, Target = 95CPI = 88.5, Target = 95 91.4 88.5 88.5 0.0 95.0 95.7 92113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.6 17.63740 1.9 2.93740
High needs 11.7 5.1780 7.8 9.0780
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.6 7.4270 0.0 0.02725
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 4.2 3.7540 12.5 11.15425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.9 17.93580 2.0 2.83580
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.8 32.33750 6.0 8.33750
High needs 10.3 7.7780 20.5 24.4780
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.6 11.1270 3.2 11.1270
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 2.0 3.75425 28.6 29.6540
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.2 31.83590 5.9 7.83590
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.5 13.711725 0.9 4.31170
High needs--28---28-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.5 13.311325 0.9 3.51130
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 48.0 38.0 -10.0 51.0No36625Below Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 42.0 47.0 5.0 51.0No7850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 44.0 57.0 13.0 51.0No2775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 41.0 44.5 3.5 51.0No5450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 48.0 38.0 -10.0 51.0No35125Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 42.0 46.5 4.5 51.0No36650Below Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 42.0 48.0 6.0 51.0No7850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 42.0 38.0 -4.0 51.0No2725Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 43.0 49.5 6.5 51.0No5450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0No35150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students38337899Yes38337999Yes12111998Yes
High needs848196Yes848196Yes302997Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged313097Yes313097Yes11---
EL and Former EL6---6---2---
Students w/ disabilities575495Yes575495Yes20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---2---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino7---7---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White36536099Yes36536199Yes11611498Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles