Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Groton Dunstable Regional
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Groton Dunstable Regional
Organization Information
District:Groton-Dunstable (06730000)School type:High School
School:Groton Dunstable Regional (06730505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.8, Target = 99.4CPI = 99.8, Target = 99.4 98.9 99.9 99.8 -0.1 99.4 99.5 94207100Above Target
High needsCPI = 98.6, Target = 94.5CPI = 98.6, Target = 94.5CPI = 98.6, Target = 94.5 90.5- 98.6 -0.6 94.5 95.3 8937100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  100.0---- 100.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.7, Target = 99.3CPI = 99.7, Target = 99.3 98.8 99.9 99.7 -0.2 99.3 99.4 81195100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.7, Target = 99CPI = 98.7, Target = 99 98.3 99.9 98.7 -1.2 99.0 99.2 95207100Above Target
High needsCPI = 92.6, Target = 93.1CPI = 92.6, Target = 93.1 88.1- 92.6 -2.4 93.1 94.1 913775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  94.6---- 97.3-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.8, Target = 99CPI = 98.8, Target = 99 98.2 99.9 98.8 -1.1 99.0 99.1 93195100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.9, Target = 98.8CPI = 97.9, Target = 98.8 97.9 97.9 97.9 0.0 98.8 99.0 90200100Above Target
High needs  88.9---- 94.5-37--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  87.0---- 93.5-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.8, Target = 98.8CPI = 97.8, Target = 98.8 97.9 97.9 97.8 -0.1 98.8 99.0 84189100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 72.8 60.92070 0.0 0.020725
High needs 33.3 32.4370 0.0 0.03725
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 73.0 61.51950 0.0 0.019525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 89.1 83.12070 0.0 0.52070
High needs 56.7 45.9370 3.3 2.73725
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 88.8 84.11950 0.0 0.51950
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 50.3 51.02000 0.0 0.52000
High needs--37---37-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 49.7 51.91890 0.0 0.51890
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 55.0 54.0 -1.0 51.0No20175On Target
High needs --- 51.0-36--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 55.0 54.0 -1.0 51.0No19175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 72.0 68.0 -4.0 51.0No201100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-36--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 72.0 66.0 -6.0 51.0No191100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.8, Target = 80 99.0 97.8 -1.2 80.0 90.0228100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.7, Target = 80 94.7 96.7 2.0 80.0 90.030100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.019--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.011--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.010--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.01--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 80 99.0 98.0 -1.0 80.0 90.0202100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 99, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99, Target = 85 97.0 99.0 2.0 85.0 95.0206100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 85 81.8 94.7 12.9 85.0 95.03875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilitiesCohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 85 78.6 92.6 14.0 85.0 95.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.012--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 99, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99, Target = 85 96.8 99.0 2.2 85.0 95.0191100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.3, Target = 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.18086275On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 1, Target = 0 0.0 2.3 1.0 1.3 0.0 0.06810550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 0 0.0 1.9 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.06784--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------33--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 -0.3 0.1 0.16779725No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students214213100Yes214213100Yes21421199Yes
High needs403998Yes403998Yes403998Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged10---10---10---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities313097Yes313097Yes313097Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian11---11---11---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19919899Yes19919899Yes19919799Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles