Massachusetts School and District Profiles

George R Austin Intermediate School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - George R Austin Intermediate School

Organization Information
District:Freetown-Lakeville (06650000)School type:Elementary School
School:George R Austin Intermediate School (06650015)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 94.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.9, Target = 94.4 75 or Higher All Students 90.4 84.5 83.9 -0.6 94.4 95.2 4247825No Change
High needsCPI = 72.1, Target = 85.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.1, Target = 85.9 75 or Higher High needs 75.9 73.1 72.1 -1.0 85.9 88.0 3214625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.3, Target = 79.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 75.3, Target = 79.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 77.7 77.7 75.3 -2.4 79.6 88.9 428925No Change
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63, Target = 81.3 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 63, Target = 81.3 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 68.0 62.3 63.0 0.7 81.3 84.0 467150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84, Target = 94.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84, Target = 94.3 75 or Higher White 90.3 84.4 84.0 -0.4 94.3 95.2 2846225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.3, Target = 90.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.3, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher All Students 84.1 82.3 85.3 3.0 90.7 92.1 4947850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.4, Target = 81.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.4, Target = 81.1 75 or Higher High needs 67.6 67.2 72.4 5.2 81.1 83.8 3414650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.7, Target = 75.2 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 76.7, Target = 75.2CPI = 76.7, Target = 75.275 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 72.9 72.9 76.7 3.8 75.2 86.5 5189100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.6, Target = 75.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 61.6, Target = 75.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 58.3 55.5 61.6 6.1 75.7 79.2 417150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.2, Target = 90.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 85.2, Target = 90.4 75 or Higher White 83.6 82.2 85.2 3.0 90.4 91.8 3446250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 92.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.7, Target = 92.9 75 or Higher All Students 87.9 83.1 86.7 3.6 92.9 94.0 7023650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.7, Target = 86.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.7, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher High needs 76.9 73.5 75.7 2.2 86.5 88.5 756850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.3, Target = 80.3 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 76.3, Target = 80.3 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 78.5 78.5 76.3 -2.2 80.3 89.3 833925No Change
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.9, Target = 82.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 71.9, Target = 82.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 70.6 65.5 71.9 6.4 82.9 85.3 793250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.8, Target = 92.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.8, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher White 87.7 83.5 86.8 3.3 92.8 93.9 5922750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.6 11.34780 5.1 5.04780
High needs 3.1 2.11460 13.1 11.614625
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.7 2.2890 9.8 9.0890
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 1.7 1.4710 22.0 19.77125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.2 11.34620 5.2 5.04620
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.6 29.347825 6.4 5.447825
High needs 9.2 13.014625 19.8 13.714625
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.8 14.68925 13.3 10.18925
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 8.57125 35.6 21.17125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.6 29.046225 6.3 5.446225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 18.0 25.023625 3.7 4.22360
High needs 9.2 7.4680 9.2 11.8680
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.6 12.83925 7.0 10.3390
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 0.0320 13.8 18.8320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.8 25.122725 3.5 4.02270
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 46.0 49.0 3.0 51.0No45650Below Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 38.0 45.5 7.5 51.0No13050Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 49, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 37.0 49.0 12.0 51.0No8375On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 39.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 34.0 39.5 5.5 51.0No5850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 48.0 49.0 1.0 51.0No44350Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 77, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 60.0 77.0 17.0 51.0Yes460100Above Target
High needsSGP = 76, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 54.0 76.0 22.0 51.0Yes133100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 76, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 55.0 76.0 21.0 51.0Yes84100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 69.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 52.0 69.5 17.5 51.0No60100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 77, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 5175 or Higher White 60.0 77.0 17.0 51.0Yes446100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students48548299Yes48948699Yes24023799Yes
High needs15014999Yes15215199Yes696899Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged9090100Yes9292100Yes3939100Yes
EL and Former EL4---4---3---
Students w/ disabilities747399Yes747399Yes333297Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---5---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White46846599Yes47046799Yes23122899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles